Categories
9th & Congress

9th & Congress: “Islamic Games” are “Identity Sports”

It didn’t take long for Grapevine-Colleyville ISD and Cy-Fair ISD to back off their offer of the use of public school facilities to host the so-called “Islamic Games,” once it was revealed that one of the sponsors was the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has linked to foreign terrorists.

What’s harder to figure out is why anyone in those school districts considered hosting an athletic event exclusively for Muslims in the first place. The website for the Islamic Games of Dallas calls its program the “premier athletic platform” for Muslim children in America, but there is no explanation of why we need a separate athletic platform for Muslim kids. Is it because of religion?

We don’t have “Presbyterian Games,” “Baptist Games,” or “Jewish Games” set aside for athletic programs for children of those faiths, although when large Catholic high schools compete around the country—Loyola and St. Ignatius in Chicago, for example and Central Catholic and Jesuit in Portland—it is always unofficially billed as the “Holy War.” But that’s just competition, not segregation.

We also don’t set aside “athletic platforms” for racial or ethnic groups. Hispanics, Asians and African Americans don’t have special athletic competitions. There are no “White People Games.” Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) have several athletic conferences that are almost exclusively HBCUs, but many of those schools also participate in other NCAA conferences. And Black athletes are certainly not limited to those venues. The NCAA estimates that based on self-reporting, about 50% of Division 1 NCAA football and basketball players are African American.

The people of Texas, speaking through the Texas Legislature, have made it clear they don’t want our education programs divided by identity—race, gender, ethnicity or religion.

They want every student to be judged on his or her own merit, their initiative and their ability to learn, progress and accomplish their goals. Nowhere is this more important than in sports, where teamwork, thinking under pressure, striving against the odds and listening to others are critical to success.

The NCAA doesn’t know how many Muslims or Jews participate in campus sports because they don’t keep records based on religion. But they estimate it’s about 1% for each group. To contrast the “Islamic Games” model, consider the great story about Jeff Retzlaff, the quarterback for Brigham Young University last season who was one of only three Jewish students on campus. BYU has a great football team and there were a number of stories about Retzlaff learning to become their leader, when many on his team had never met or talked to a Jewish person before. Retzlaff got a NIL deal from the kosher food processors, Manischewitz, raising his profile—and the profile of the Jewish community in college sports.

Retzlaff transferred to Tulane this season, a university that also has only a tiny number of Jewish students, where he played in a College Football Playoff game last month. We can be glad that Retzlaff wasn’t segregated off into some kind of “Jewish Games” athletic platform so he’d only play sports with other Jews. His non-Jewish teammates at both schools call their experience playing with him life-expanding.

The “Islamic Games,” aren’t about building any of that. They aren’t about leadership or athletic skills. Instead, they are one of many efforts by some in the Muslim community to block the assimilation of Muslim kids and the Muslim community into American culture and the larger American community.

As TPPF Board member Cody Campbell has repeatedly and clearly articulated, school sports are a big part of the glue that holds our communities together—where we all share the same values of working hard, achievement and merit. Sports are where our kids learn to think under pressure, where they learn to listen to people they may have nothing in common with other than the game, where they learn push to defy the odds, and where they make friendships that will last a lifetime.

None of that will happen at some weekend sports program at the local high school where the only kids allowed to participate are Muslim. Let’s assume the folks at Colleyville-Grapevine and Cy-Fair were just trying to be nice, and hope they look more closely before they decide to host a program that only includes one religion, or one ethnic group or one race.  Texans don’t support identity politics – or identity sports.  That’s not who we are.

My colleague, Mandy Drogin, and a stunning panel of experts are going to discuss the issue of what the Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR and others are doing to destabilize Texas and dismantle Western culture next Tuesday. CLICK HERE for more information.

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.Foundation, and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

You can also listen to the Sherry Sylvester Show on Apple or Spotify.

Categories
Winners & Losers

Winners & Losers: Davos, the Bible, Indiana and More

Every Friday morning, I join the Cardle & Woolley Show on Talk 1370 Radio in Austin to announce the week’s Winners & Losers. Currently, it feels like we are living in scenes of “Game of Thrones” in which dark, ominous voices keep warning us that “winter is coming.” As we prepare to face down a national storm, here’s who made the list.

WINNER: Trump Gets the Win at Davos

Americans who pay attention knew before President Donald Trump got on the plane to the World Economic Forum in Switzerland that he was going to get some kind of deal on Greenland. In the end, it all seemed to be handled almost immediately after Air Force One landed in Davos. Trump said he had a framework to move forward with in Greenland, so he would not have to slap a bunch of new tariffs on Europe, which was circling the wagons around Denmark. And, of course, he added that there was never any real chance that he’d put boots on the ice to force the takeover.

No details regarding the framework were provided, but talks with Denmark will continue and the scuttlebutt is that the U.S. will expand its military bases – which we could already do.

Some, including the Free Press’s Niall Ferguson, have suggested that Trump’s decision to make Davos all about Greenland was another example of what a great strategist he is. He distracted the European leaders with Greenland to buy himself more time to consider Iran.

If that’s true, it totally worked. As U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant told the European elite to chill, saying, “America First doesn’t mean America alone,” Trump posted a graphic on Truth Social that showed America taking over Greenland, Venezuela and Canada. The European leaders took the bait and went ballistic, lining up to take turns taking umbrage. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney became their spokesperson, with a long whiney speech insisting that the West could no longer count on the United States. Carney said international relations were irretrievably broken because the World Health Organization, the Conference of Parties (one of the UN’s climate change outfits) and the United Nations have been stripped of their power.

Seriously, Carney actually listed the World Health Organization first, the people who “managed” the global COVID 19 pandemic and currently push international guidelines for “gender affirming care.” If anyone should be stripped of power, it’s the WHO. As for the UN, its mission is to protect world peace. Let’s compare its heir success rate to Trump’s.

In the end, Trump gets the “W.” He controlled the entire narrative and came away with the framework of a deal on Greenland and a template for a new Board of Peace. All the European leaders have to show for the week is telling the folks back home that they gave the Canadian Prime Minister a standing ovation.

LOSER: The Media’s “Bible-Infused” Curriculum

The term “Bible-infused curriculum” popped up again this week in the Texas media. It is a dishonest and deliberately misleading term designed to hamper all those working to improve reading skills in public schools.

At the direction of the Texas Education Agency, following the lead of the Texas Legislature, the State Board of Education has created a required reading program for Texas schools, including listing about 30% of books and readings that are required for students.

What is causing Texas reporters to light their hair on fire is that Texas students will be exposed to 10 excerpts from the Old and New Testaments during their 12 years in public school. Kindergarteners will be required to learn the Golden Rule and hear the story of the Good Samaritan. “Jonah and the Whale” will be required reading for seventh graders, along with the Sermon on the Mount. These are foundational documents for human rights and Western civilization, which any minimally educated person of any faith should be familiar with.

Opponents of the reading program showed up in meetings holding signs that read: “Public School is not Sunday School.” The Houston Chronicle posted the entire reading list, which includes over 320 books and readings, so it’s hard to see how 10 excerpts from the Old and New Testaments results in a “Bible-infused curriculum.”

LOSERS: Democrats in Texas, Gavin Newsom and the Rest of Them

Texas House administrators announced this week that the 50 Texas Democrats who left the state last summer to block a quorum vote on a new Texas congressional redistricting map will be fined $9,354 each to cover the cost of the 14 days the House was unable to do business while they were gone, as well as their share of $125,000 the state police spent trying to round them up.

Democrats spent their campaign funds to charter planes to Chicago and Washington, D.C. and pay for hotels, but Texas House rules require that they come up with the money themselves to pay the fines. The lawmakers are trying to portray themselves as heroes (or martyrs or even just people who matter), but even on left wing television shows in Chicago and New York, they were being asked “why are you here?” They called it a “quorum bust,” but it was just a bust. The redistricting bill passed.

Meanwhile, as national Democrats try to resurrect their brand, California Gov. Gavin Newsom refused to give a straight answer to conservative podcaster Ben Shapiro this week when he asked him whether boys should play in girls’ sports.

Newsom has said in the past that he didn’t believe boys playing in girls’ sports was fair, but he was blasted by his Democrat base, so this week he inexplicably replied to Shapiro, “there but for the grace of God.”

He doesn’t make clear, “but for the grace of God,” what? Would he be a boy who wanted to play on a girls’ team? Would he be a girl who had to fear playing against a boy? Would he have been caught on tape like Kamala Harris, saying he totally supports sex-change surgeries paid for by the government? “For the grace of God,” what?

Polling clearly indicates that American oppose boys playing in girls’ sports, and it was a factor in the Democrats’ wipeout defeat in 2024. Still, leading Democrat voices don’t have talking points on this issue. Axios, a left-leaning media source, asked this question of Harris, New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy, California Rep. Ro Khanna and California Gov. Gavin Newsom—and they all declined to comment.

LOSER: Norway Cheats at Skiing

We have to add Norway to the losers list this week after the International Ski and Snowboard Federation suspended two coaches and an equipment manager who were caught on tape during the winter Olympics reconfiguring the ski pants of two members of Norway’s national ski jumping team. In what is being reported as a national scandal, the coaches apparently managed to stitch something into the ski pants that made them more aerodynamic, so the skiers could fly even higher through the air. It’s kind of a reverse of the New England Patriots deflating footballs.

The cheating scandal has shaken Norway’s national identity. They have dominated Olympic skiing for at least 100 years, and have always been sticklers for following the rules. However, every skier is going to want those ski pants, which will undoubtedly become legal, and every athlete will have them by the time the next winter Olympics roll around. Can’t wait to watch.

LOSER: Texas Still Moving in on Wall Street

President Donald Trump is a big fan of Texas and most Texans love him, but he is also a native New Yorker and he made it clear this week that the New York Stock Exchange is in bad shape if Texas is opening up its own stock exchange in the Metroplex.

Trump criticized New York City’s socialist mayor, Zohran Mamdani, and New York businesses for letting it happen—although there’s no indication that he blames Texas for the financiers making the move. Dallas Mayor Eric Adams calls Dallas the home of capitalism.

WINNER, LOSER? Kamala Harris

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro is one of the most prominent Jewish leaders in America. He was on Kamala Harris’s short list for vice president and is now always listed as a potential Democratic candidate in 2028. He is releasing a new memoir, which made news this week when he reported that Harris’s vetting team asked him if he’d ever been an agent of the Israeli government. Shapiro rightly viewed the question as hostile and anti-Semitic.

Harris made her pick while progressive Democrats around the country were marching against Israel and in support of Hamas terrorists, so most believed there was never a chance she would pick a Jewish running mate. We do not know if she asked the guy she actually did pick, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, who had made dozens of trips to China, if he was a Chinese agent. Apparently, she also didn’t ask Walz about the Somali fraud investigations already underway in Minnesota.

Shapiro believes Harris’s team was incompetent, but not everyone agrees. Harris is still touring the country selling her book and, reportedly, the former vice president is drawing big crowds in the South. Jacksonville, Mississippi gave her the keys to the City. Women are cheering her on, apparently unaware that the transformation of Mississippi schools, which have moved the Magnolia State from the bottom to the top in reading and math scores, was accomplished only when the locals managed to push back the teachers unions, who were one of the largest financial supports of Harris’s presidential effort.

LOSER: Global Trust at an All Time Low

A new global report on the disappearance of trust in institutions provides a bit more insight into what happened in Davos this week. Researchers found that increased polarization is not only happening in America, but also throughout the world. The latest findings released last week show that shared facts are becoming non-existent.

The late New York Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan iconic political saying, “you are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts,” is no longer true. Everyone has their own facts, and trying to challenge them is like trying to communicate with someone speaking in another language.

The global report found that people’s trust in government and media remains at rock bottom—nobody believes a thing they say. However, people do report feeling more trusting of what they hear from their friends and families and even their boss. Only 35% of people report that they regularly get information from a source they disagree with and 70% are unwilling or hesitant to connect with someone who:

  • Lives by different core values than me
  • Believes different facts and trusts different sources than I do
  • Wants to address societal problems differently than I do
  • Has a different culture, background, or lifestyle than mine

If you haven’t spoken to anybody who disagrees with you today, go out and find someone and say hello.

WINNER: Indiana Football Deserves a Movie

According to Texan Mark Cuban, it’s time for “Hoosiers,” the classic film about Indiana basketball, to get a sequel. Cuban is an Indiana alum. Like most people who saw Indiana win the national championship in Miami on Monday night, he believes the next one will be even better.

“Now, it’s a movie,” Cuban said. “Now, we’re all a part of it.”

Against all odds, Indiana won the College Football Championship after having the worst record of any school in the country. It was an exciting championship game against the University of Miami Hurricanes, which also has a good comeback story. The best moments included Trump getting cheered by the crowd and seeing him with his granddaughter, Kai who has committed to the University of Miami golf team. It was also inspiring to see both quarterbacks kneel to pray before kickoff. Every detail capped off a terrific college football season.

LOSER: What is Wrong with the NFL?

If only we could settle into the NFL playoffs for the rest of the winter, but, unfortunately, the guys over there must have missed the college playoff game—the quarterbacks demonstrating their faith, Trump getting cheered, the military being honored.

The Super Bowl announced this week that Trump haters Green Day will be playing at the opening ceremony, joining “Bad Bunny,” who is the starring act at half-time. Green Day has revamped its signature anti-American song, “American Idiot,” to say “I’m not part of a MAGA agenda.” Meanwhile, Bad Bunny has said he’s afraid to perform in America because ICE might pick him up.

NFL, please give us a break.

We’re inching up on March Madness, and in college basketball, the men of the University of Houston, ranked No. 6, will play Texas Tech on Sunday if weather permits (which it probably won’t). The No. 4 ranked Texas Lady Longhorns are scheduled to play Arkansas on Monday.

Finally, just asking. Is Landman a Conservative TV Show? Watch my podcast with my TPPF colleagues Brian Phillips and Michaelanne Hurst here.

Stay glued to those weather alerts and have a great weekend!

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Sign up to receive this in your inbox every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.

Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on AppleSpotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

Categories
Sherry Sylvester Show

Sherry Sylvester Show Ep. 47 | Is Landman a Conservative TV Show? Feat. Brian Phillips & Michaelanne Hurst 

The New Yorker said Taylor Sheridan’s Landman demonstrates “how conservative TV might be a damn good time.” TPPF’s Sherry Sylvester invites Landman superfans Brian Phillips and Michaelanne Hurst to the show to assess the series’ core themes (hint: it’s not just about the oil industry).

Listen to the Sherry Sylvester Show on Apple & Spotify

Categories
Winners & Losers

Winners & Losers: Abbott’s $100 million, Trump’s Peace Prize & the Immigration War

Every Friday morning, I join the Cardle & Woolley Show on Talk 1370 Radio in Austin to announce the week’s Winners & Losers. President Donald Trump finally has a Peace Prize, Texas has a team in the Super Bowl hunt and it looks like Verizon is working again. Here’s who made the list:

WINNER: Gov. Greg Abbott’s $106 Million Campaign War Chest

In what the Dallas Morning News calls a “chest-thumping number,” Texas Gov. Greg Abbott officially reported this week that he has a total of $106 million on hand for his re-election campaign this year—a figure that withers any efforts by Democrats to take over the Governor’s Mansion anytime soon. Note that Texas House Democrats bragged this week that they have raised a little over $2 million, mostly from folks around the country who supported their Capitol walkout last year. The Texas Democrat big dog, Beto O’Rourke, who has declined to run for anything again, also raised $2 million. Democrat U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico has raised over $6 million and his opponent, Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett, reportedly has close to that amount, although her progressive allies are currently criticizing her for taking money from the wrong people.

Which is not to say that it is all about the money—or even mostly about the money. Abbott’s broad support from the business community of Texas is a clear sign that people like the direction the state is going—job creation, productivity increases and, of course, Abbott’s lead role in passing school choice last year. The response from Texans is “let’s keep going.” Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick also broke campaign fundraising records reporting $38 million on hand for his re-election. Both Abbott and Patrick are running for fourth terms.

WINNER: Maria Machado Gives Her Nobel Peace Prize to Trump

After the Nobel Committee passed over President Trump in October, I reported that peace prizes are not usually awarded on merit—(see Barack Obama). But sometimes they are. Yesterday, Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado gave her Nobel Peace Prize medal to President Donald Trump, expressing gratitude to Trump for taking out dictator Nicolas Maduro, and for his support of the resistance movement.

Bloomberg says that Norway is stunned by the news that Machado gave her prize to Trump after they specifically told her it was not transferable.

According to the news report, “a sense of disbelief gripped the Norwegian media and expert community”—don’t you love that Scandinavians have a “media and expert community?”

Janne Haaland Matlary, a professor with the University of Oslo and a former politician said, “That’s completely unheard of. It’s a total lack of respect for the award, on her part.” [It is] “meaningless” and “pathetic.”

Of course, Dr. Matlary has it backwards. “Meaningless and pathetic” are what the Nobel Peace Prize has become. Machado has made it relevant again.

LOSER: Immigration Wars in the Streets

We are accustomed to living in a world in which half the people have a viewpoint that is diametrically opposed to the other half. The immigration wars going on in the streets of Minneapolis now are a stark example.

There is no question that the progressive left had been looking for a “George Floyd” moment and they believe they got it when an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer shot and killed Renee Good on Jan. 7. Fully 80% of Americans say they have watched all the videos of the shootings and most everyone has an opinion.

A strong majority—over half—do not believe the ICE agent was justified in using deadly force against Good.

Meanwhile, the same poll shows that just over 60% of Republicans believe the shooting was justified. Almost all Democrats—over 90%— do not, which means that the country has settled into their camps on this issue, before there has been any investigation.

There are lots of arguments we would all like to hurl at the progressive anti-ICE marchers, starting with why they never seem to get mobilized in response to victims who have been killed by illegals, but it is also fair to ask for an investigation to determine why this woman was killed by a law enforcement official. Unfortunately, by the time the investigation gets moving, people will be even more dug in. Nobody is going to win the immigration war in the streets. Everybody is a loser.

LOSER: Verizon’s “Software Issue”

If we needed more evidence of how our fragile world is held together by our cellular service, it came on Wednesday when Verizon’s system went down for about 7 hours—people with Verizon phones couldn’t call out and nobody could call them.

Verizon couldn’t tell you how many of their customers lost service, only saying that 1.5 million people reached out to them to complain. I kept wondering how they could complain if their phone wasn’t working—which is why I suspect it was many more than 1.5 million.

Verizon called it a “software issue,” not a cyberattack, but the reports from other cell phone companies all seemed a little shaky. AT&T and T-Mobile said some customers reported problems to them, but they think it was only because they were trying to call Verizon people. Shouldn’t they know whether their systems are working or not?

Verizon is offering $20 credit to people who were affected, but speaking in solidarity with Verizon customers, I don’t think that will nearly cover the pain and suffering.

LOSER: Crockett Has a Bad Week

Woke apologies are pretty much over, everywhere except in Hollywood and among progressive Democrats, which is apparently why two comedians apologized to Texas U.S. Senate candidate Jasmine Crockett this week for telling voters they should not waste their money on contributions to her campaign.

Two guys nobody has heard of, Bowen Yang and Matt Rogers, described by their compatriots as “white and white adjacent,” went on Instagram to say how sorry they were to have been insensitive, shortly after they were accused of attacking Crockett because she is a black woman.

In addition to the fundraising story noted above, Crockett has not had a great week. The first real poll in the U.S. Senate Democrat primaries from Emerson College shows State Rep. James Talarico, D-Austin leads Crockett 47% to 38%. Pollsters say that Talarico is leading among white and Hispanic voters, while Crockett has about 80% of black voters.

LOSER: Bill & Hillary Clinton Duck Subpoena

Granted, nobody really expected former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to show up on Capitol Hill this week to answer questions about what they knew about Jeffrey Epstein.

The Clintons called the whole thing a “witch hunt,” a term frequently employed by the current president, and they insisted they’d already told everything they know.

Well, maybe, but I don’t believe we have gotten to the bottom of those silky silver shirts that the former President and Epstein are wearing in the most recent set of photographs that were released earlier this year.

House Oversight Chair James Comer, R-Kentucky, is moving forward to hold them in contempt of Congress, but that probably won’t make much difference. It is already pretty clear they have nothing but contempt for Congress.

WINNER: More Evidence the Whole Trans Thing is Over

Now that the U.S. Supreme Court is finally considering whether boys should be allowed to participate in girls’ sports, one of my colleagues on the radio version of Winners & Losers actually made the Supreme Court losers this week because the justices wasted so much time asking the pro-trans lawyers dumb questions that all boiled down to what a woman is.

But cultural change is a long process, and if the reading of the tea leaves is correct and the Supremes are poised to block boys and men from playing in girls and women’s sports, this will be an important victory for our women, our values and culture and our country. Since all that is at stake, the Supreme Court was right to push the ACLU attorneys for the details of their case—they need to put their case on record, even if the Court’s liberal justices, aside from Ketanji Brown Jackson, did not seem inclined to join in.

Just in case the Supremes don’t actNevada’s governor is collecting signatures to put a Trans ban on the ballot in the Silver State. Meanwhile, in San Antonio, they are still fighting for rainbow sidewalks.

LOSER: Shake Shack Gaining Ground in Texas

News reports came out this week that another Shake Shack is going up in Leander, forcing speculation that the New York City-based hamburger joint is trying to oust Whataburger from the No. 1 burger spot in Texas.

Granted, there are only 30 Shake Shacks in Texas now, compared to about 800 Whataburgers, but Texans cannot be complacent. Now that red meat is back on the top of the food pyramid, we cannot let some New York ground beef restaurant spawned in the middle of Manhattan threaten Texas’ iconic Whataburger.

It is true some folks believe that Whataburger lost its claim to a Texas title after it sold controlling interest to a Chicago company. But Whataburger is still headquartered in my hometown of San Antonio, and they are bullish about maintaining their Texas brand—and we all should help them. You can’t just show up in the Lone Star State, throw up a hamburger stand and say you belong here.

WINNER: College Football Championship & Super Bowl Speculation

Indiana will play the University of Miami on Monday night for the College Football Championship. To review how we got here, pull up the last 15 weeks of Winners & Losers.It’s a great story. Kick-off is at 6:30 p.m., Texas time.

Meanwhile, Super Bowl Sunday is Feb. 8, but the Elite 8 is set, so it’s time to start official speculation. Let’s begin with the projection model at the New York Times which somehow calculates that the Seattle Seahawks have the highest percentage chance—23% of the eight teams still in the fight—to win the Super Bowl. The Times ranks the NFC higher than the AFC and give the Rams the second highest chance. They give the Texans a 10% chance to win—the Patriots and the Broncos do a little better in the AFC.

Have a great weekend!

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Sign up to receive this in your inbox every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.

Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on AppleSpotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

Categories
Winners & Losers

Winners & Losers: Maduro’s in Jail, Somali’s Steal Billions and Red Meat is Back on the Menu

Every Friday morning, I join the Cardle & Woolley Show on Talk 1370 Radio in Austin to announce the week’s Winners & Losers. The holidays are totally over now, and 2026 is up and running in earnest with big happenings all over the world—and in Texas. Here’s who made the list:

WINNER: Trump Takes Out Maduro

President Donald Trump’s capture and arrest of Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro reinforced several foundational American values and principals, but it was also another demonstration of a smaller, but important point in the world conversation—no other country has the military capability to do what we did in Caracas last weekend. Like the obliteration of Iran’s nuclear facilities, Maduro’s arrest and capture is a clear reminder to the world of America’s military supremacy. Even America’s biggest detractors (including the Democrats in Congress) should sleep better at night knowing that the good guys have all that power.

My TPPF colleague, Joshua Treviño, has made the most succinct statement on why Trump was right to take out Maduro on Jan. 3, so I am just going to quote him here from an op-ed published earlier this week in National Review:

Venezuela’s corrupt leaders got away with it for too long. They sent forth millions of their own citizenry to be trafficked, and they got away with it. They trafficked the drugs that killed and addicted millions of our neighbors and family, and they got away with it. They formed alliances with cartels dealing in goods and people, and they got away with it. They entered into the business of narco-terrorism, and they got away with it. They invited the worst enemies of the United States into the Americas — the Russians, the Chinese, the Iranians — and they got away with it. They did all this for years, and they got away with it.

This impact of Maduro’s arrest will continue to play out in the coming days—and probably for years to come—and we’ll keep watching, but there is no doubt Trump made a winning move and executed it masterfully.

America’s thinking on Trump’s action in Venezuela has been shifting all week as people get more information. Early in the week most polls showed only about a third supported the president but new numbers put out by CBS News yesterday show about half of Americans now believe the president is doing the right thing. A strong majority of Republicans supported the action from the beginning.

The president also gets a thumbs up for withdrawing from 31 United Nations organizations and 35 other international groups that push left-wing ideologies and operate contrary to American interests. The U.S. sends billions to the United Nations which they spend on programs pushing climate change, DEI and other anti-American ideas. To paraphrase former U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene on another topic, “let them hate us on their own dime.”

LOSER: Gov. Tim Walz, the Minnesota Fraud

“Tim Walz and the Minnesota Fraud,” sounds a little like a rock band. Financial shakedowns are an old tradition in the Democrat party, dating at least from President Bill Clinton, whose administration used them extensively when doling out HUD money. However, our top loser of the week, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, seems to have lifted Democrat corruption to a whole new level.

Testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform this week revealed that the state auditor knew as early as 2009 that there was extensive fraud in the welfare system in the state of Minnesota, but Gov. Walz looked the other way and nothing was done. State workers continued to raise concerns, but they were ignored.

Happily, it has finally all come crashing down, and Gov. Walz announced this week that he will not run for reelection. Hopefully, losing his job won’t be the only consequence for his ignoring the fact that billions in federal funds earmarked to feed children during the pandemic, provide services for children with autism and other special needs, provide housing for poor people and treatment for drug addicts was instead given to fraudsters in the Somali community in Minnesota.

The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board provides a good summary of what has happened so far—including charges against 90 offenders—but the best political perspective on the fraud perpetrated by the Somali community in Minnesota came from Congressman Brendan Gill, R-Texas, in that same congressional hearing.

WINNER: Another Congressional Hearing Home Run for U.S. Rep. Brendan Gill, R-Texas

We all remember when Rep. Gill took down NPR CEO Katherine Maher by reading her tweets back to her after she denied ever saying such things as “white people all feel subconsciously superior.” This week, Rep. Gill brought the same chainsaw to the congressional hearing on welfare corruption in the Somali community in Minnesota, questioning local officials about some interesting statistics:

73% of Somali community Minnesotans are on Medicaid, compared to 18% in the general community.
81% of the Somali community are on welfare. After living 10 years in Minnesota that percentage drops to 73%.
54% of Somalians are on food stamps, compared to 7% in the general community.
Rep. Gill closed by asking the officials whether Somali voters back Democrats or Republicans. The answer of course, is that they overwhelmingly vote for Democrats. It’s all here in the video. Really makes you proud when you hear Chairman James Comer say, “the Chair recognizes Mr. Gill from Texas.”

LOSER: Home Ownership is a Weapon of White Supremacy

When I was in high school, there was a sign over the water fountain that read, “What Communists Believe.” The first and only item I remember on this list was “communists believe there is no God,” which was a deal-breaker for me and my other fellow teenagers at the time, so I didn’t pay attention to what came next.

Now the Democrat Socialist mayor of New York City has appointed Cea Weaver to serve as head of his Office of Tenant Advocacy, and she’s revealed some more details about what communists believe regarding private property.

In an August 2019 tweet, which Weaver recently deleted, she wrote “Private property including and kind of ESPECIALLY homeownership is a weapon of white supremacy masquerading as ‘wealth building’ public policy.”

In 2021 Weaver said “…for centuries, we have really treated property as an individualized good and not a collective good.” Her plan is to transition to a model of shared equity in order to think about property differently. She explained what she means by saying that, “white families and some POC [people of color] families who are homeowners… are going to have a different relationship to property than the one that we currently have.”

Seeing Weaver’s words on the page doesn’t do them justice. Take a look at the video.

LOSER: Los Angeles Homeowners

In case you missed it, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass this week marked the one year anniversary of the devastating fires in the California Palisades by boasting that 12 houses have been rebuilt. Yes, Mayor Bass is claiming victory that 12 houses, out of the over 13,000 homes that were destroyed, have been rebuilt.

However, the mayor’s unbelievable effort at positive spin is not the worst thing about California’s inability to rebuild. In an echo of the old liberal cliché, “World ends—women and minorities suffer most,” the folks at UCLA are more concerned about whose homes are being rebuilt rather than the numbers. According to them, African-American homeowners made up a large share of the population of Altadena California, which was destroyed by the fires, and the professors at UCLA‘s Latino Policy and Politics Institute warn that those homes are likely to be the last to be rebuilt.

Since virtually nobody’s home is being rebuilt in California, you have to wonder why the folks at UCLA want to suggest that white people are cutting in line. The point is there is no line, just a brick wall of state government red tape.

Still, so far, at least black homeowners in Altadena don’t have to fear that some bureaucrat is suggesting they shouldn’t actually own a home because it is a “symbol of white supremacy, masquerading as wealth building public policy.”

Let’s pause for just a moment and give thanks that we live in a state where “wealth building public policies” are known to be a good thing.

LOSER: Beto O’Rourke Hasn’t Gone Away
Perhaps this is good news for Republicans, or maybe it doesn’t matter, but just so you know, Axios reported this week that Beto O’Rourke, who has been defeated by U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz and Gov. Greg Abbott and pretty much every Democrat who ran for president in 2020 (except Kamala Harris), is now reportedly working behind the scenes to help Texas Democrats. You may have missed the fact that he’s been campaigning in red zones like Amarillo, Wichita Falls and Tyler, and a September University of Texas/Texas Politics Project Poll showed he had higher favorability ratings among Democrats than U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas. Not seeing a ripple effect here, but will keep you posted.

WINNER: Texas Supreme Court Ends Bar Association Hegemony

In another blow against the hegemony of DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion), the Texas Supreme Court formally announced this week that the American Bar Association (ABA) will no longer determine which Texas law students can sit for the Texas bar exam. Instead, the Texas Supreme Court, whose members are elected by the people of Texas, will now develop their own criteria to approve law schools.

The ABA has long required law schools to establish strong DEI programs that are now in conflict with new Texas laws that require student admissions and faculty hiring to be based entirely on merit. And although the ABA claims to be non-partisan, it has taken official positions in support of a number of issues, including restricting fossil fuel use and limiting the death penalty. To show how out of touch they are with Texans, the ABA’s strongly opposed requiring a photo ID in order to vote—a policy that is supported by 85% of Texans, including minorities and members of both parties.

The Texas Supreme Court is the first state to make this winning move, but news reports indicate that Florida and Ohio are also poised to cut ties with the ABA.

WINNER: Eat Real Food

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s edict this week that America “Eat Real Food” has implications that go far beyond the dinner plate. One of the chief ideological tenets of the progressive left—along with the notion that there are lots of different genders and there should be no enforcement at the border—is that what you eat says a great deal about who you are.

The left would classify eating steak as a sin, if they believed in sin, so the new food pyramid—with its big picture of red meat at the top—is likely to make lefties go crazy. There’s also a left-wing war on dairy, causing us to live in a world where people actually drink something called “oat milk” and demand gluten-free communion wafers.

The rest of us, who have known since the Atkins diet in the 1980s that protein, fruits and vegetables are the key to health and carbs are the road to oblivion, were not surprised by Kennedy’s policy change, although we know it will take more than a new pyramid graphic to make it happen. The phony flavors created by food companies—like the orange stuff on Cheetos—are as addictive as cocaine and will be hard for people, especially children, to kick.

My favorite recommendation is that kids be prohibited from having added sugar until they are 10 years old, although I have no idea how they will pull it off. Currently, the recommendation is age 2, and I doubt if many parents are following that guideline.

It is disappointing that RFK, Jr., did not include a recommended daily requirement for coffee and chocolate, which we all know are two essential nutrients that make life worth living—along with steak.

WINNER: A 1951 Treaty Gives America Lots of Rights in Greenland

Secretary of State Marco Rubio is going to Denmark this week to discuss U.S. interests in Greenland. That’s a good sign that both Rubio and Danish officials read the very interesting op-ed in the New York Times this week that pointed out that the United States signed a treaty with Denmark during the Cold War which gives us broad military access to Greenland. According to Mikel Runge Olsen, of the Danish Institute for International Studies in Copenhagen, “the U.S. has such a free hand in Greenland that it can pretty much do what it wants.”

The Danish op-ed writers say the agreement allows the U.S. to construct, install, maintain, and operate” military bases across Greenland, “house personnel” and “control landings, takeoffs, anchorages, moorings, movements, and operation of ships, aircraft, and waterborne craft.”

So perhaps we can just start constructing, installing and operating and see where it goes from there. Greenlanders are pretty dug in against allowing the United States to take over at this point, but once they get to know us, I’m betting they will like us. We can barbeque a bunch of steaks, schedule a few country music concerts and win them over in a week.

WINNER: The College Football Playoffs

Despite everything that went wrong and continues to go wrong in college football, we are coming to the end of a terrific season. Last weekend, college football fans watched as the so-called “big dogs,” Ohio State, Alabama and Georgia, became “former big dogs” and last night’s semi-final game between Ole Miss and Miami was one of the best of the season, with Miami coming out on top in the last minute.

The Red Raiders, the last Texas team in the CFP fight, were defeated by Oregon last week, but Tech has stepped up with a “get ready for next year” messaging strategy this week that has been dazzling, including getting a commit from almost a dozen new players from the portal, including Brendan Sorsby.

I married into an Oregon Duck family and am a longtime fan who’ll be watching the other semi-final game tonight to see if the Quack Attack can overcome the seemingly unstoppable Indiana Hoosiers on their second try. There’s a 3.5 point spread in Indiana’s favor. The game is at 6:30 p.m. and the winner will face the University of Miami on Jan. 19.

Have a great weekend!

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Listen to Winners & Losers on Talk 1370, the Cardle & Woolley show, every Friday morning at 8:30 AM. Here’s the listen live link.

If you were forwarded this email, you can sign up to receive it every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.

Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on Apple, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

Categories
All Over the Map

All Over the Map: A Journey from Left to Right

Happy 2026! As we start the New Year, I want to share the opening of the book I am writing, “All Over the Map: A Political Journey from Left to Right.” There are more chapters to share and I will keep you updated as the year goes along. Winners & Losers regular programming will return next week.

All Over the Map: A Journey from Left to Right

Introduction

Political scientists routinely describe the current division in American politics as “tribal,” as if the seething intensity each side feels for the other is something new. I was born into a family whose political roots run deep, and I can tell you, unequivocally, that politics has always been tribal.

I grew up in an Oklahoma, still caught between its “Grapes of Wrath” complex and the “wind sweeping down the plain” images from the Broadway musical. I went door to door with my father when he was running for office, and I collected campaign brochures like baseball cards. I do not recall a time in my life that I did not know who the political allies and enemies were.

I learned West Coast politics among the tree-hugging hyper-progressive elites of Oregon and then moved east, where I watched the Democrats from the wealth belt of New Jersey push all their chips into the middle of the table to keep Bill Clinton in the presidential race. I worked for the City of New York as it buckled under the crushing weight of bankruptcy, garbage and disease, and I saw it rescued, against all odds, by a Republican named Rudy Giuliani.

I watched Donald Trump sort through his early wives and figure out his shtick in New York and I saw how sex, race and ethnicity all become political forces before identity politics reduced them to a chorus of whining grievances.

I helped the Democrat machine elect the first African-American mayor of New York City and worked on the U.S. Senate campaign of Geraldine Ferraro, the first woman to run for vice president on a major party ticket. Later, I worked for over a decade for the Lieutenant Governor of Texas, an outspoken right wing leader who serves as a symbol of the conservative movement in Texas and its spokesman in many parts of America.

I called myself a socialist Democrat, progressive and decidedly left-wing before I called myself a conservative, and arrived at the place I mostly inhabit now—the proud, bright red right wing, (though not the fringe) of the Republican Party.

One thing I have never called myself is a moderate.

Politics is a difficult habit to kick, not that I have ever really tried. Unlike Alexander Hamilton, I have often been fortunate enough to be in the room where it happened, or at least in the building where it happened or the city where it happened. That is what keeps you coming back.

In 1988, after the Democratic team was crushed in the presidential election, I asked the legendary Democrat political strategist Robert Shrum for his advice on what I should do while we waited out the four year purgatory before the next election. He told me I had to decide if I wanted to be a pundit or a player.

At that time, nobody knew more about politics than Bob Shrum, so I figured I had to pick a lane. But every time I embraced being a political player, I found myself compelled to create the punditry and policy to explain the moment. However, even after I established myself as an analyst and a pundit, I could never stay off the political playing field for long. I had to get back in the game.

Decades later, it is clear Shrum was wrong. I didn’t have to choose. I have been a political player and a pundit my entire life and have left a written trail, going from political battle to policy wars across the country. The question I get most often is how did I get from way over there on the left to way over here on the right?

“All Over the Map” is the very long answer to that question.

Oklahoma Reds and Liquor-by-the-Drink

All four of my grandparents were living proof that politics has always been tribal. They were all born in the last decade of the 19th Century: 1889, 1891, 1895 and 1896. They migrated west from Tennessee, Illinois and Arkansas, and north from Texas, and settled in the Oklahoma oilfields at the turn of the century. They settled in a place called Oilton, three miles from the banks of the Cimarron River, and just west of the line that separated Indian Territory from Oklahoma Territory.

My father’s grandfather fought for the Union in the Civil War, and my other three grandparents were grandchildren of Confederate soldiers. But the Civil War did not drive the everyday narrative of any of them, even though they were all born about 30 years after Appomattox and must have grown up hearing about the war that their families had lived through.

Instead, they were part of what some call the “recovery generation,” after the Civil War. About 20% of all children were gainfully employed by the age of 10 at the time, and the stories my grandparents told all stemmed from hard times and survival—which had shaped their world view and defined their politics.

Their thought leader was Will Rogers, the legendary Oklahoma-born humourist and political commentator and, like him, they believed Oklahoma was the heart of the country. They thought the red clay of the Cimarron River was the lifeblood of the nation, kind of an Okie Nile. I was baptized in that river.

My grandmother told me that her father had been part of the socialist movement known as the Oklahoma Reds that grew out of the dustbowl. The Working Class Union (WCU) in Oklahoma elected almost 200 people to the state legislature between 1915 and 1917, and their gubernatorial candidate got 30% of the vote in 1916. They were anti-capitalist isolationists, driven left by the exploitation of farmers by Northeastern banks. It’s not clear whether my great grandfather was a Socialist or a Communist, but whichever it was, my grandmother did not share his views.

Late in her life she told me, “My father was always going to Socialist meetings and talking about what was said. He had Socialist magazines and newspapers all over the house. I read them all and I didn’t believe a word of it. So in 1918, when women got the right to vote in Oklahoma, I went right down and registered Republican.”

She voted Republican her entire life, much to the consternation of my father who thought her political choice reflected her ignorance. The Democrat Party was the party of working people. Oklahoma was a Democrat state and had been since the beginning. To vote Republican meant you were opting out of most elections, since the victor of the primary was always the ultimate winner. The only other Republicans anybody knew about were African-Americans.

Her husband, my grandfather, was also a Republican for family reasons. He told me that because his father had fought for the Union, in “Lincoln’s Army,” he voted Republican in his honor.

In my mother’s family, politics was driven by cultural issues. My mother’s father had been a bootlegger during Prohibition, and our family albums include several arrest and conviction clippings. He mostly shifted away from criminal activity after Prohibition ended, but stayed in the beer joint and night club business, sponsoring the occasional floating poker game on the down-low.

My grandfather’s bar had a big picture of Will Rogers on the wall, the same Will Rogers who said he “didn’t belong to an organized political party; he was a Democrat.” I can never remember not knowing that joke.

Rogers is most famous for saying is that he never met a man he didn’t like, but his political commentary was all based on “us”—the Everymen of Oklahoma and America and “them” —the rich, the elites in the Northeast and the ridiculous people in Hollywood. He made fun of both sides, but it was tribal.

In my first trip to Washington, D.C. after college, my family made sure I found the statue of Will Rogers in the Capitol—Oklahoma’s contribution to Statuary Hall. It’s in a prime spot outside the U.S. House Chamber, and television crews today call it the “Will Rogers stakeout” because they can ambush lawmakers there and force interviews.

The big picture of Will Rogers in my grandfather’s pool hall may have provided him with the inspiration to keep battling to legalize liquor-by-the-drink in Oklahoma. It was legal to buy a glass of beer (nobody drank wine), but a bar could not dispense hard liquor.

Most bars, including my grandfather’s, got around the law by declaring they were private clubs and handing out membership cards to customers to display if the police showed up. The liquor bottles all had people’s names written on them—to prove that the members had brought them in and the bar was just serving them. This charade went on in honky tonks and fancy hotels. It was the Oklahoma way.

Liquor-by-the-drink was on the ballot every election year when I was growing up. My grandmother always had a Legalize Liquor by the Drink bumper sticker on whatever big Oldsmobile she was driving.

I asked my father once about life during the Depression, and he told me that 1933 was the worst year. There was no money, and he and his father had worked for food because everyone was trading by a barter system. But he added, “Of course, your grandfather had money.” Apparently, the bar business was always good.

My bar-owning grandparents were “yellow dog,” straight-ticket Democrat voters, but it didn’t help them. They died in the early 1980s before liquor-by-the-drink became legal in Oklahoma.

All Politics Really are Local

All four of my grandparents made it very clear to me that politics mattered and understanding it was important, but it was my father who showed me what living a political life meant. He ran for city council when I was in elementary school, and later was elected mayor when I was in high school. He was always in contested elections, often engaged in the very bitter battles that define small town politics. I grew up campaigning.

Although my father had strong political views, he was a reluctant politician. Going hungry during the Depression haunted him throughout his life. So did his time fighting in four theaters of war during World War II. He remained angry that President Franklin Roosevelt had promised that “no American son would have to fight in more than two theaters of war,” but he’d been shipped into four.

He didn’t think he’d make it back, but he did and returned to the oilfield job he got when he graduated from high school. While he was still, in his 20s, he was urged to run for city council. He seemed to exemplify the greatest generation before they knew they how great they were.

After a few terms on city council, he was elected mayor—a job which famously paid one dollar a year—and pushed forward an expansive agenda for our town starting with buying the water company, a move that meant that anytime someone had low water pressure, they called our house to complain.

The track survey for our little town was wonky, so he walked every block and assigned each house its proper number. Then he got the Boy Scouts to sell everybody new house numbers.

My parents supported President Lyndon Baines Johnson, and after he launched the War on Poverty my father got a call from a guy in the newly established office of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) who wanted to meet with him and get a tour of our little town. My dad was very excited about this because he had some ideas about building some housing for old people and young families who really needed it.

His real job was in the oil fields, so on the day of the meeting, he had to take off work and change his clothes before he could meet the HUD man. He made it back to our house just in time for dinner.

When my Mom asked him how it went, he laughed and said that the man from HUD had condemned the entire town, pronouncing every house (including ours) as substandard. He wanted to tear them all down and build new ones.

My mother was wild eyed with disbelief. Our house had been given to us by my grandfather, and my Dad had fixed it up. We lived next door to the house where my mother was born. She told my father unequivocally they he could not let them tear down our house.

My Dad assured her that wouldn’t happen, dismissing the HUD men and his colleagues as “crazy bureaucrats.” It was the first time I ever heard that term, but it ultimately helped me understand the entire War on Poverty.

The HUD man never returned and no houses were torn down. A couple years later, I was home from college for the weekend and my father asked me to help him fill out a HUD grant application to build the low-income rental housing he’d envisioned. The town was awarded the grant and built 20 units across from the baseball field. They are still there.

I don’t think our neighbors ever had any idea what he’d saved them from.

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Listen to Winners & Losers on Talk 1370, the Cardle & Woolley show, every Friday morning at 8:30 AM. Here’s the listen live link.

If you were forwarded this email, you can sign up to receive it every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.

Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on Apple, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.