Categories
Winners & Losers

Winners & Losers: World Has a New Pope, Texas has a Star Base

Every Friday morning, I join the Cardle & Woolley Show on 1370 Talk Radio in Austin to announce the week’s Winners & Losers. With tariffs are coming down everywhere but China, and less than a month to go in the Texas legislative session, here’s who made the list:

WINNER: Catholics Weigh-in With New Pope

We used to say that every election was a fight for the hearts and minds of America, but now the biggest battle is for the hearts and minds of the world, which makes the election of a new Pope especially significant. A war is being waged against Western civilization, which is built on the principles of love, faith and freedom, rooted in Judeo-Christian faith. Catholics have chosen a leader they hope can fight that battle.

Everyone is scrambling to learn as much as they can about the first Pope born in America, Pope Lex XIV, who is a Chicago White Sox fan and has Creole roots in Louisiana, but who has lived most of his life outside America as a missionary. Catholics are the largest branch of the Christian church, with 1.4 billion members, and the Pope is an important symbolic world leader, even for those of us who are not Catholic. In his first sermon this morning, he shared his view that too many in the world are living in a kind of de facto atheism that robs lives of meaning, joy and respect for life. To see what that can lead to, just look at those folks who are once again on the Losers List—the Pro-Hamas Protesters arrested this week at Columbia who were circulating pamphlets glorifying an anti-Israel terrorist and ignoring edicts to stop hate and anti-Semitism. The same scene played out at Brooklyn College, where protesters crashed into campus buildings, hoisting Palestinian flags and chanting support for terrorists.

WINNER: UT Establishes School of Civic Leadership

Meanwhile, at the University of Texas, Gov. Greg Abbott, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and UT Leadership including Board of Regents Chair Kevin Eltife announced yesterday that they will build a new building for the School of Civic Leadership, established in 2023, to “grow citizens who understand the ideas and institutions that have made free, prosperous societies possible.”

According to the leaders of the School of Civic Leadership, its mission is to wrestle with the great ideas of the Western tradition and answer the critical timeless questions regarding the nature of justice, leadership and truth. Its scope of study includes “the best achievements and greatest difficulties of the American tradition in order to understand what it takes to preserve the blessings of liberty for ourselves and for others.”

According to the latest survey from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Freedom (FIRE) the ratio of liberals to conservatives at the University of Texas is 4 to 1, and almost half the students say they do not feel comfortable speaking out in classrooms or even among friends on campus. The School of Civic Leadership could not have come at a better time.    

WINNER: Marco Rubio

Remember when President Donald Trump used to call Marco Rubio “little Marco?” Now, of course, he calls him “Secretary Rubio,” as the Secretary of State who just got the added job title of National Security Advisor.

Trump speculated this week that while Vice President J.D. Vance is most often named as his obvious successor, Rubio would also be on the list as the possible next GOP president based on his stellar performance in the first 100 days. There are hundreds and hundreds more days until 2028, but it is still worth noting that, at least for now, Rubio made the short list.

WINNER: Texas’ Newest Star Base

It’s official. Voters, almost all of whom are employees at Elon Musk’s SpaceX’s launching site in South Texas, voted to become a Texas city on Saturday by a margin of 200 to 4. Following on that win, SpaceX got approval this week to do 25 Starship launches a year from the new city named Starbase, which is near Boca Chica. Musk first moved SpaceX and Twitter, now known as X to Texas to Texas in 2024. In addition, Musk’s son, X, lives here, which prompted Gov. Greg Abbott to recently quip that all Musk’s eXes are in Texas.

LOSER: No Prizes for the Pulitzers

It is not news that the Pulitzer Prize Committee is a leftist cabal. This year they gave an award to Pro-Publica—the activists who got people’s IRS records and then reported them. Their latest most patently egregious example is that the photo of the year was not the iconic shot of President Trump rising and raising his fist after he was shot in Butler, Pennsylvania, taken by AP Photographer Evan Vucci. Instead, the prize went to a photographer who got a photo of the president while he was on the ground after the shooting.

Axios claimed at the time that there was concern among some in the media that the photo of Trump raising his fist after he was shot was “free PR” for the then-presidential candidate. Other media even mused that had they thought about the impact of the photos sooner, they might not have distributed it so broadly.

It is hard to know which is worse—the fact that the Pulitzers ignored a photo that will obviously go down in history, or learning that some in the media actually said that had they thought about it, they might not have released the defiant photo of Trump at all.

LOSER: Jasmine Crockett

The latest on Dallas Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett is that one of her Republican colleagues spotted her at the Atlanta airport apparently jumping the line in front of disabled passengers to get on a plane. Crockett, who is angling for a new position on the House Oversight Committee, is clearly trying to be the new Democrat “it girl” and is making every effort to “out-AOC” AOC, (Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez). When President Trump pointed to Crockett as just one more example of the lack of serious people in the Democrat Party, Crockett went on X and replied that the president is “terrified of smart, bold black women.” 

Apparently Crockett didn’t notice what happened when fellow Dallasite Mark Cuban said Trump didn’t like to be challenged by strong, intelligent women. The blowback from strong, intelligent women who support Trump, including his chief of staff and others who work for him, was massive. As for black women, perhaps Rep. Crockett should take a look at the strong black women in this interview by CNN’s Van Jones.

WINNER: Van Jones Talks to Black People in South Carolina

If CNN wrote a news story about what their commentator, Van Jones, learned in South Carolina, where he went to talk to African Americans who voted for Trump, I couldn’t find it. But what Jones reported is worth taking a couple minutes to WATCH.

In speaking with several African American voters in Charleston, Jones said that most people thought of Trump voters as “white guys in red hats,” very unlike the black South Carolinians he was talking too who did not fall for any of the lefty dog whistles Jones laid out. He asked them their reaction to President Trump taking down Harriet Tubman’s picture for a minute, before it was put back up (a very big story on the left), but South Carolinians said that kind of thing isn’t important. He asked them about Trump supposedly removing Biden’s guidelines on how police should deal with black people. In response, one “bold black woman” told Jones that her husband was in training to become a law enforcement office and she is disgusted with the way police are treated. Another man said he voted for Trump because he is authentic. All of them said they had no regrets about their vote and would absolutely vote for him again. Perhaps Rep. Crockett should pay more attention.

WINNER: Paxton Sues Austin ISD for Teaching CRT

Attorney General Ken Paxton is suing Austin ISD for teaching Critical Race Theory (CRT) , a move that is causing the usual wailing and gnashing of teeth among public school educators who cannot seem to understand why they cannot continue to teach the often de-bunked 1619 Project on the sly, even after the Texas Legislature banned it from public schools.

CRT is an anti-American ideology based on the false notion that American was founded to further slavery and that every American institution is built on white supremacy. Consequently, the 1619 Project asserts that America’s real beginning was not at Plymouth Rock, but instead in 1619 when the first Africans arrived in Virginia. The mission of CRT is to pre-empt American history and discredit all other accounts of our past. CRT is not presented as just one theory, it is presented as fact, which is probably why some instructors at Austin ISD appear willing to not be truthful about teaching it in defiance of the law.

WINNER: Watching Sports

The Nielson Ratings, which told us what the country was watching on TV, are antiquated now, and a new system called Big Data Plus Panels is now giving us a much better picture of what Americans are watching. The answer is sports, all sports, and all the time. Forgot Netflix, Prime and the wars between Fox News and CNN. The only thing that gets all eyes glued to one screen is sports. Football draws far more than any other sport, but lots of folks are watching the second round of the NBA playoffs to see if the Knicks can really take down the champion Boston Celtics. They are up 2-0 in the series after two great games. Game 3 is tomorrow night.

Have a great weekend.

 

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Sign up to receive this in your inbox every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.

Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on AppleSpotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

Categories
Winners & Losers

Winners & Losers: 100 Days, Faith, College Football & More

Every Friday morning I join the Cardle & Woolley Show on 1370 Talk Radio in Austin to announce the week’s Winners & Losers. Somehow it is already May, and the Texas House will start working Saturdays tomorrow as they speed toward June 2. Meanwhile, the numbers on President Donald Trump’s first 100 days are dazzling—although the U.S. still does not own Greenland. Here’s the list:

WINNER: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick Making Religious Liberty Great Again

President Trump went to the Rose Garden yesterday to announce he is establishing a Religious Liberty Commission that will be chaired by Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick. Former HUD Secretary Ben Carson will serve as vice chair, along with dozens of other religious luminaries including Rev. Franklin Graham, NY Archbishop Timothy Dolan, Rabbi Meir Soloveichik and Dr. Phil.

In accepting the appointment, Patrick noted that despite America’s great heritage of religious liberty, people of faith were under attack during the four years of the Biden administration. He pledged to carry out the president’s mission to ensure that all believers are free to pray and worship God anywhere in this country.

Patrick is embarking on his mission at an interesting time in the war against faith. The U.S. Supreme Court has heard three religious liberty cases this term, including the one argued last week by a coalition of parents of faith in Maryland who were denied the right to keep their children out of LGBTQ+ classes. The Court considered a case in March in which the state of Wisconsin declared that Catholic Charities was more charities than religious, so they took away their tax exemption. This week, the Court heard the religious charter school case in Oklahoma.

These legal battles always bring out the usual atheist blather that Americans should not have to be exposed to anything involving faith or belief. However, it is interesting to note that some prominent atheists are taking a decidedly different stand these days. Tom Holland, Louise Perry and even notorious atheist Richard Dawkins have been saying of late that the values Christianity brings to a culture, which have been the bedrock of Western civilization since Christ died 2000 years ago, are a positive force for good, even if you don’t believe in God.

As a believer, it is hard to understand why seeing that good does not lead to a deeper exploration of faith. Still, it is important that even atheists recognize that cultures that are rooted in Judeo-Christian values are stronger and better for people than cultures that aren’t.

Lt. Gov. Patrick lives his faith and has written eloquently about the ways it has transformed his life and the lives of those around him. With his leadership at the Presidential Commission on Religious Freedom, all people of faith will be able to live their faith and tell their stories.

WINNER: Trump’s First 100 Days

We have been reflecting on the first 100 days of Trump 2.0 since Day One and when the milestone finally arrived on Wednesday, the scorecard was official—143 Executive Orders, 100,000 deportations of illegal criminals and almost zero illegal crossings at the southern border. DOGE found billions of dollars in government waste, and billions in federal funds were pulled from anti-American academic institutions. The Gulf of America is a thing and Europe has been repeatedly reminded who is paying their defense bills. Froot Loops won’t have those garish colors anymore and freedom has come for plastic straws.  

Trump did all this and more while receiving almost exclusively negative media coverage from ABC, CBS and NBC, which were followed by the Washington Post and, of course the two government funded outlets, National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service, which he defunded today. The Media Research Center found that out of 1,841 statements made by journalists, anchors, reporters, and experts during evening news broadcasts from January 20 to April 9, a total of 1,692 of the statements—92%—were negative.

For just one example, left-wing media routinely trash Trump’s open cabinet meetings, but at a minimum, they illustrate just how broadly Trump sees his scope of work. The contrast with the lethargic Biden administration, where everything happened behind closed doors, is stunning.

WINNER: Trump Defunds PBS and NPR

In an Executive Order late Thursday night President Trump directed the Corporation for Public Broadcasting to stop giving federal funds to National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). In a masterful statement that will be difficult for elite journalists to refute, Trump’s EO read:

“Government funding of news media in this environment is not only outdated and unnecessary but corrosive to the appearance of journalistic independence.”

It was that easy. Makes you wonder why it took so long, since many of us have advocated for de-funding PBS and NPR for decades. Both media outlets only get a small portion—10% to 15%—of their funding from taxpayers, so they won’t go away, but it will be fun to watch how they change going forward. Do stodgy, elitist news shows have a future?

LOSER: San Marcos City Council’s Anti-Israel Resolution

San Marcos, which for many is a wide place in the road between Austin and San Antonio, made big time news this week when a couple City Council members decided to step into international affairs and proposed a resolution calling for a cease fire in the Hamas war in the Middle East, an arms embargo against Israel and the recognition of Palestinian sovereignty.

Gov. Greg Abbott immediately threatened the city with the withdrawal of state grant funding because the move violates Texas law prohibiting boycotts against Israel. The council members’ wordy resolution calls Israel’s response to the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack a “genocide” and accuses Israel of “apartheid and illegal occupation of Palestinian land.”

The proposal made quite a scene at the San Marcos City Council meeting, with dozens of pro-Palestinian supporters waving signs. Testimony continued until 1 a.m., and although no vote was taken, news reports say it had votes to pass. This outrageous City Council meeting shows how the ignorance of academia can poison a community. Sleepy San Marcos, of course, is home to Texas State University, where according to FIRE, the ratio of liberals to conservatives is 3 to 1, and 76% of the students say it is sometimes acceptable to shout down a speaker you don’t agree with. Apparently, anyone who knew anything about what is actually going on in the Middle East was shouted down.

LOSER: Texans Paying for Illegal Immigrant Health Care

According to a report by the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, over 31,000 illegal immigrants visited Texas hospitals in 2024, including 22,000 who went to emergency rooms. The state estimated the cost of those visits to be $121.8 million, which doesn’t count the time lost by Texans who had to wait for care or who could not be given care because of overcrowding. Texas has borne these less-visible costs of illegal immigration for decades, and Gov. Abbott was right to ask the state to start keeping records. No one is surprised by these numbers. It’s another cost of open borders.

WINNER: Sen. Ted Cruz Passes Revenge Porn Bill

The fact that any bill passes in Washington is big news, but this past week, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz’s legislation to ban non-consensual posting of nude photographs, including AI generated shots, passed the House. It now awaits President Trump’s signature, which is very likely since First Lady Melania Trump went to the House to lobby in support of the Legislation. Cruz spoke out about the devastating impact of fake images on teenagers, especially girls, as well as what phony postings can do to families and children. The fight against this kind of thing from AI has undoubtedly just begun, but Cruz has staked out a spot on the moral high ground.

LOSER: Democrats 100 Days Under Trump 2.0

So far, the Democrat opposition hasn’t been able to get any footing against President Trump in the first 100 days, probably because they spend most of their time defending men who say they are women and trying to keep illegal alien criminals in the country. A move to impeach the president fizzled before it started this week. Meanwhile, former vice presidential candidate Tim Walz said this week he was picked to run because he could “code talk to white guys,” and former Vice President Kamala Harris, currently the leading contender for the Democratic nomination in 2028, gave her first speech this week talking about how elephants band together during earthquakes. Finally, ActBlue, the Democrats’ primary fundraising machine, which has long been the gold standard in raising campaign money, is being investigated for big time fraud. As we start the second 100 days, all thumbs are pointing down for the Democrats.

LOSER: Harvard

For those keeping score in the Trump versus Harvard battle, first Trump took away $2.2 billion in federal funding. Then Harvard roared back with a lawsuit (even though it is a private school) and all the other Ivy League schools rallied around it, pledging to join in the fight against Trump’s war against academia. Next, Trump threatened to take away Harvard’s tax exempt status and then Trump’s budget, just released today, slashed funding for higher education. Unfortunately for Harvard, in the middle of this fight, a report was released by the university itself showing how the school suppressed diversity of thought and pushed political agendas. Harvard’s president called the report “painful and disappointing,” but most everyone else sees it as no surprise. This is the same university that gave us Claudine Gay.

WINNER: Tommy Tuberville Speaks Out on NIL

Texan Cody Campbell, who chairs the Texas Tech Board of Regents, is the national thought leader on reforming college sports, starting with NIL and the transfer portal. Campbell has pointed out that college sports not only provide a lifeline for thousands of athletes, they also are a vital part of American life and culture that fuels economic vitality in college towns across the nation. The current NIL system threatens all of that, including the non-revenue producing sports—that’s everything except football and men’s basketball. Women’s sports, Olympic sports, college baseball, soccer, track, gymnastics, will not survive under the current system. Yesterday, former coach and Alabama Sen. Tommy Tuberville got on board, calling on Trump to push for college sports reform sooner rather than later. Let’s hope the president puts this on his list for the second 100 days.

That’s a wrap. Have a great weekend.

 

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Sign up to receive this in your inbox every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.

Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on AppleSpotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

Categories
9th & Congress

Texas Universities Need More Reform

After Texas passed the strongest anti-DEI legislation in the country last year, the faculty and administrators who opposed it predicted apocalypse.

They insisted that professors would leave Texas and no talented prospects would come to replace them. They said students would wander their campuses lost in despair without DEI’s identity-based support centers and programs that separate students on the basis of race, gender and sexuality — the “oppressors” and the “oppressed.”

Two years later, the sky has not fallen; Texas institutions of higher education are among the best in the nation. Still, there are academics who are part of the wider DEI infrastructure—faculty members and administrators—who remain disgruntled.

They insist the work of DEI is to help minority and marginalized students succeed in college, and to ensure that faculty members reflect Texas’ great multi-cultural community.

But neither point is even remotely true. Minority enrollment and faculty diversity did not increase in the decades after DEI programs were put in place on Texas campuses, because closing gaps and real inclusion aren’t the goals of DEI. Their objective is re-writing history and undermining American values.

According to the National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education, the mission of DEI is to “engag[e] in ongoing ways to incorporate alternative narratives in the curriculum and provide robust learning opportunities on the history of racism, colonization, and conquest and on how higher education and other sectors of society have been complicit in maintaining systems of privilege.”

DEI, as expressed both in and out of the classroom, is rooted in the notion that systemic racism and patriarchy are the core foundation of every American institution. That is why using DEI as a minority recruitment tool has not been successful in increasing the number of minority or marginalized students or improving their graduation rates or outcomes. The Texas Legislature was absolutely right to get rid of it.

When Senate Bill 37, the next wave of higher education reform, passed the Texas Senate, some of the same professors and administrators who opposed the anti-DEI bill raised their voices to predict Armageddon again. Leonard Bright, a professor at Texas A&M’s Bush School of Government and Public Service, told the Dallas Morning News that the bill represents a “political invasion.” Professor Bright said “Ultimately the goal of the bill [SB 37] is to intimidate faculty, quiet our voices and to punish us for having the courage to speak truth to power.”

Talk of intimidation is pretty rich coming from faculty members who, until SB 17 passed two years ago, had made sure anyone who wanted to be considered for a university job had to present a “diversity statement” pledging their fealty to the ideology of DEI.

Led by Harvard’s resistance to President Donald Trump’s recent decision to pull $2.2 billion from the school because of its failure to address anti-Semitism and revert to merit-based admissions and hiring, university professors across the country are circling the wagons, vowing to protect their “right” to continue to play a leading role in running universities and determining what is to be taught. The professors at Texas universities who oppose SB 37 may be inspired by this “resistance” movement.

But there’s a big difference. Faculty members at public universities in Texas are state government employees. Their salaries are paid by taxpayers and ultimately, they answer to the people’s elected representatives. They have not been anointed with some edict from on high that gives them complete control over what is taught in classrooms or spoken on campus.

SB 37 clarifies this by affirming that Boards of Regents have the responsibility for hiring all university leadership and ensuring the curriculum is fundamental and foundational, so that every course of study will produce graduates with the skills to succeed in the global economy and serve as good citizens. It also makes clear that the role of faculty in both hiring and curriculum is strictly advisory.

Some faculty insist that expanding the role of the Boards of Regents in curriculum review will somehow violate their academic freedom, but most courses, like Numbering Race and Measuring Racial Inequality, can still be taught. They just can’t be used to substitute for core credit in place of Introduction to Mathematics, Differential Calculus or Statistical Literacy. SB 37 won’t limit ideas in the classroom, but it will require that precepts like the DEI premise that every sector of American society is complicit in maintaining white privilege is not presented as fact.

Faced with the reality of change, some faculty argue that SB 37 drastically departs from how Texas universities have “historically operated.” Perhaps they are right, but look at what that history has gotten us. In addition to failing to increase diversity and foster successful outcomes for minority and marginalized students, they have created college campuses where too many students are afraid to speak their minds. According to the latest survey by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), 40 to 50 percent of students at Texas universities say they are afraid to say what they think both in class and on campus.

FIRE also found that, while the ratio of liberals to conservatives is 1 to 1 at Texas A&M and Texas Tech, at the University of Texas at Austin, Texas State and the University of North Texas, the ratio is 4 to 1—about the same as Harvard.

This insulated ivory tower does not serve Texas students or the taxpayers who provide billions for state universities. The changes in the way Texas universities are governed put forward in Senate Bill 37 are critically needed. It is time.

 

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Categories
Winners & Losers

Winners & Losers: Too Many F’s, Too Much Regulation + Harry Potter

Every Friday morning, I join the Cardle & Woolley Show on 1370 Talk Radio in Austin to announce the week’s Winners & Losers. Today marks President Donald Trump’s 95th day in office, while the Texas Legislature has knocked out 102 of the constitutionally allotted 140 days in the regular odd-year session. Here’s the list:

Winner: Education Savings Accounts Come Just in Time

When the always-eloquent Senate Education Chairman Brandon Creighton, R-Conroe, rose in the Texas Senate Chamber to concur with the version of Senate Bill 2 that had passed the House, he noted that the Texas Education Freedom Act will transform education in our state—expanding options and restoring hope for thousands of children in our state. After overcoming three decades of resistance from education bureaucrats who repeatedly made it clear they care more about their jobs than their students, the bill now goes to Gov. Greg Abbott’s desk for his signature.

Loser: Too Many Texas Public Schools

Those bureaucrats were working down to the wire to keep the truth from Texas parents about how poorly many of our public schools are performing. Yesterday, after overcoming a lawsuit from more than 100 school districts, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) released school ratings for 2022-23 school year which revealed that one in five Texas public school students attend a school that is rated D or F. These ratings are particularly galling for those who spent the last 102 days watching the school choice battle at the Capitol and hearing teachers’ unions and their Democrat water-carriers insist that letting parents choose the best school for their child would destroy public education in Texas.

Looking at the ratings, you have to wonder how much worse it could get. Despite state spending that hovers close to $100 billion, the number of F-rated schools increased from 4.5% to 7.6 percent in 2022-23. TEA says it evaluated 8,539 public schools; 19.3% received an A, 33.6% got a B, 24.7% a C, and 14.8% received D’s. So the flip talking point is that only one in five students goes to an A-rated school.

The school districts that had sued to stop release of the ratings had charged that TEA had changed the rating system in the five years  since the last A-F school grades were last released. But after the 15th Court of Appeals ruled TEA could inform parents about how their kids’ schools were performing, the ratings showed both the scores the school would have received using the old ratings as well as the new rating system. Many grades dropped a few points with the new standards, but some schools scored higher with the new criteria. You can view the available ratings here. TEA still cannot release the ratings for the 2023-24 school year because school officials have filed a separate lawsuit. In other education news, California is considering allowing community college students to sleep in their cars because housing is so expensive.

Loser: Federal Regulation

Those who insist that Elon Musk is over-doing it with his war on waste, inefficiency and over-regulation should take a look at the report that came out last week from the Competitive Enterprise Institute, which found that federal regulations cost $1.2 trillion annually, about the same as Americans pay in federal income tax. According to the report:

US households pay on average $16,016 annually in a hidden regulatory tax, which consumes 16 percent of income and 21 percent of household expenses.

These household outlays exceed expenditures on health care, food, transportation, entertainment, apparel, services, and savings. Only the costs of housing, which stand at $25,436 annually, exceed regulation.

Winner: J.K. Rowling and Texas Stand Up for Women

J.K. Rowling, author of the beloved Harry Potter series, has been brutally besieged for years because she refused to bend the knee to those who insist that men who declare themselves to be women actually are women. In addition to death threats, cancellation and hate attacks—Scotland passed a law targeting her that would make it illegal to “stir up a hate crime.” Several of the actors in the Harry Potter movies denounced her—rendering those films unwatchable now for those of who care about facts and science.

But Rowling finally won the war when the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom declared this week that there are only two biological sexes—an important ruling, for the British were the first to perform sex change operations and then became the first to halt them after research showed that they were hurting patients instead of helping them.

Meanwhile, Axios reports that Texas legislators have filed more legislation reining in men who say they are women than any other state, as if that’s a bad thing. In all, 120 bills have been filed here, twice as many as Missouri, which is in second place. Texas legislators have already passed laws that prohibit boys from playing in women’s sports. New proposals seek to ensure women’s privacy is protected in public restrooms and locker facilities, and it would prohibit individuals from changing the sex on their birth certificates or other official documents, as well as making sure teachers can’t be fired for using the wrong pronouns. There’s a nationwide Trans legislation tracker here.

Winner: U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Laredo

Another week has passed, and as far as anyone can tell, the national strategy of the Democrats is to focus on poor gang members who beat up their wives and, of course, men who say they are women. The New York Times asked several old Democrats how the party got its momentum back after big losses in the 1980’s. They have lots of theories, but Laredo Congressman Henry Cuellar gets specific when he made it clear what Democrats should not be talking about. He noted that the South Texas border communities he represents don’t care about Kilmer Abrago Garcia, who Trump deported: “With all due respect, when you’re talking about bringing somebody—and I know there were due process questions—that was in Maryland, and now El Salvador. I don’t know if that’s the right issue that Democrats should be focusing on right now.”

Winner: No Bike Lanes Bill

Anyone who doubts the importance of Sen. Paul Bettencourt’s legislation to halt bike lanes in Texas cities needs to visit Portland, Oregon and talk to business owners there who were driven out of the downtown core of that formerly beautiful city when bike lanes virtually stopped all car traffic from moving.

Portland is known as the one of the worst sites of the Black Lives Matters riots in 2020, which destroyed many parts of the downtown, but residents with a longer memory will tell you that the bicyclists, who are a loud and powerful lobby, did as much or more damage to Portland by closing down traffic lanes and making bike lanes and bicycle travel the priority. Similar efforts are underway in the Austin now, where traffic is stifled by more and more encroaching bicycle lanes, most often with no bikes in them. Blue cities have always been anti-car for no good reason other than they don’t like them. Bettencourt is right to fight back.

Winner: Houston May John Whitmire

Speaking of blue cities, Houston Democrats are up in arms because Houston Mayor John Whitmire attended a fundraising event for U.S. Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Houston. Democrats accused Whitmire of undermining the “values and mission of the Democrat Party…” which, as noted above, appear to be the fight for men who think they are women and keeping violent gang members in the country. Whitmire served as a Democrat in the Texas House for 10 years and the Texas Senate for 40 years—literally 50 years in the Legislature—where he was always a tireless voice for his party. Since he has been mayor he has also been attacked for standing in support of the Jewish community and making sure the Houston Police Department cooperates with ICE in arresting illegal aliens. Most folks think he is focused on “values and mission.”

Winner: COVID “Lab Leak” Website

The left-wing media went nuts when the Trump administration took down all the COVID information websites and replaced them with a big blaring headline that reads COVID LAB LEAK, detailing the origins of the virus. Years of lies about COVID, the denials, the intolerance of dissent, along with the loss of freedom and lives, all had a traumatic impact on most every American. Changing the websites and setting the record straight will help Americans remember never to go so far off course again.

Loser: Joe Biden’s $300K Speaking Tour

Each week we wonder how long we will be able to keep former President Joe Biden on the Losers List—but here he is again. Granted, there is some humility in Biden’s thinking that he would get $300,000 to make a speech—former President Barack Obama gets $400,000, but the word is that bookings are not going that well. In his first official public speech since the election, the New York Post reports that he referred to black children as “colored kids,” which charitably can be called anachronistic if not offensive. This speech should not be confused with Biden’s recent trip to Harvard after Trump announced he was withdrawing federal funds to the Ivy League school. While there, Biden reportedly referred to Ukraine as Iraq, dropped his ice cream bar and departed suddenly—but then, they weren’t paying him.

Winner: Hail to the Chief

President Trump has weighed in on the school mascot controversy in Massapequa, New York, where the state government is demanding that Massapequa High School stop using a “Chief” as their mascot. It’s part of the Empire State’s overall Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) policies.

The school board in this old suburban town with an ancient Native American name argued in a federal lawsuit that they are victims of government overreach and that their First Amendment rights are being violated. Their state representative has proposed a legal carve out for Massapequa, but they should get rid of the whole law.

Trump called the change “ridiculous” and an affront to our great Indian population. He asked Education Secretary Linda McMahon “to fight for the people of Massapequa on this very important issue,” adding “LONG LIVE THE MASSAPEQUA CHIEFS!”

Have a great weekend!

 

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Sign up to receive this in your inbox every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.

Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on AppleSpotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

Categories
Sherry Sylvester Show

The Sherry Sylvester Show | Episode 40: Why Lawsuit Reform Still Matters in Texas with Lee Parsley

Sherry Sylvester sits down with Lee Parsley, President and General Counsel of Texans for Lawsuit Reform (TLR). For over 30 years, TLR has fought to reform Texas’ civil justice system, transforming the state from the “Wild West of litigation” into the 8th largest economy in the world. Lee shares insights on tort reform, the battle against nuclear verdicts, and Senate Bill 30, a priority bill tackling inflated medical damages and lawsuit abuse.

Listen to the Sherry Sylvester Show on Apple or Spotify.

Subscribe to the 9th & Congress newsletter.

Categories
9th & Congress

Trump Team Pointing Harvard To Texas Model

On Monday, federal officials announced they would freeze $2.2 billion in federal funds for Harvard University, along with an additional $60 million grant, after the school’s leadership hauntingly refused to meet new requirements that they establish merit-based admission and hiring policies, reform university governance and audit the student body, faculty, staff and leadership to make sure the campus reflects viewpoint diversity.

Trump administration leaders might have been telling Harvard to follow what has become the Texas higher education reform model. Merit-based hiring and admissions became law in the Lone Star State last legislative session when Texas passed the strongest anti-DEI legislation in the country. University governance and viewpoint diversity are central features in the higher education reform legislation that has passed the Texas Senate and is expected to pass the Texas House and become law.

Harvard quickly said no to Trump administration officials, firing back that, among other things, the federal government didn’t define “viewpoint diversity.”

It is sad, but not surprising that the people running the nation’s oldest university don’t know what viewpoint diversity is, but a quick look around Harvard Yard should give them a clear idea of what it isn’t.

The latest report from the Foundation for Individual Rights & Expression (FIRE) once again gave Harvard an “abysmal” ranking on free speech issues—the lowest of any of the 250 universities they surveyed.

70% of students at Harvard believe it is at least sometimes acceptable to shout down a speaker to prevent him from talking. Almost a quarter of Harvard students say it can even be acceptable to use violence to stop someone from speaking and over half, 53%, say they censor themselves once or twice a month from saying what they think in class or on campus.

As for viewpoint diversity, for every conservative student at Harvard there are four liberal students.

Harvard University president Alan Garber said, “No government—regardless of which party is in power—should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.”

Garber is probably right. Harvard shouldn’t let the federal government be the boss of them. It is time for Washington to pull all federal taxpayer dollars out of Harvard so they can go it alone, standing on the principles they all agree on. (Granted, more than half may disagree, but are afraid to say so). Harvard’s $53 billion endowment is tax free and larger than the GDP of 100 countries. They can scrape by without taxpayer funds.

Of course, Harvard will scream about the loss of cutting edge research underwritten by federal funds, but the scientists who are conducting that research would undoubtedly be glad to move to a university that is still receiving federal funds—because they hire and recruit based on merit.

The Trump administration says Harvard’s response is indicative of the “troubling entitlement mindset that is endemic in our nation’s most prestigious universities and colleges.” Unfortunately that “troubling entitlement mindset” is not limited to Harvard. Some faculty and administrators at Texas universities are fighting Texas reforms in much the same way as Harvard, “decrying what they call “outside influence” on campus—and wailing that their academic freedom and rights to free speech are being attacked.

By outside influences, they mean the Boards of Regents, who are appointed by the governor to run the universities. They also mean the Texas Legislature, who are elected to appropriate the state budget and the Texas taxpayers who pay their salaries. Texans invest billions in Texas universities every year in order to ensure their children can get an education that will lead to their success in the global marketplace.

The FIRE survey at the University of Texas at Austin found its free speech rating to be almost as bad as Harvard’s. In terms of viewpoint diversity, UT’s liberal to conservative ratio is also 4 to 1, mirroring Harvard.

At the University of North Texas, 75% of students believe it is sometimes acceptable to shout down a speaker with whom you disagree and 40% of students say they censor themselves regularly. This self-censoring is not just the result of youth or inexperience. A FIRE survey of faculty found that 87% of university faculty nationwide report finding it difficult to have an open and honest conversation on campus about at least one hot button political topic. Instead of centers for open inquiry, our campuses have become the realm of thought police.

At Texas A&M and Texas Tech, the liberal to conservative ratios are about one to one, but viewpoint diversity at Texas State University and the University of North Texas is as slanted as Harvard with  the ratio of liberals to conservative at 4 to 1.

Texas lawmakers have said no to all this—and more. Higher education reformers, led by Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and Senate Education Chairman Brandon Creighton, R-Conroe, are pushing back against the Ivory Tower culture. They have introduced reforms that restore universities to their mission of free speech and open debate, mandating merit based admissions and hiring and empowering Boards of Regents, while reining in faculty and administrative cabals that have created campuses where students are afraid to speak, course offerings are littered with meaningless classes and graduates receive degrees that have no value.

The Trump administration should continue to demand that universities receiving taxpayer dollars follow Texas’ lead.

Categories
Winners & Losers

Winners & Losers: Stocks Up & Down, Abbott Wins & Buying College Sports is a Loser

Every Friday morning, I join the Cardle & Woolley Show on 1370 Talk Radio in Austin to announce the week’s Winners & Losers. Lots of ups and downs this week, but here’s who made the list:

WINNER: President Donald Trump – Texas Majority Doesn’t Doubt Him
Seconds after, President Donald Trump announced he was putting his reciprocal tariffs on a 90-day pause, the Dow quickly soared to 40,000 points, the S&P index went up by more than 9%, and the sun began to break through the clouds. When he clarified that he was adding 145% tariffs on China, the clouds returned as the market trended down again.

Almost 65% of Americans are in the stock market, most because they have to be, since companies rarely offer pensions anymore. Pundits have been saying for weeks that Wall Street doesn’t like uncertainty. Nobody does, but uncertainty is one of Trump’s strategic negotiating tools—and it seems to be working. The White House reports there are dozens of countries at the table and Trump and his team are negotiating new deals now while increasing the pressure on China. Even with the whiplash trading, the week is still a win for the President because he has changed the conversation about trade, not only in America, but across the world. Inflation is also down and his “big beautiful budget bill” passed the U.S. House this week.

For the record, the pollsters over at the University of Texas Politics Project found that here in Texas, the President’s GOP base —the conservative majority —are steadfast in their belief in him. The survey, which was conducted in late February, found that 68% of Texans, including 48% of Republicans, thought Trump’s new tariffs would increase prices. But if you dig into those numbers, you can see that over two-thirds of Texas Republicans believe the president is right, and tariffs will help the U.S. economy in the long run.

President Trump also had several legal wins this week. The Supreme Court allowed Trump to use the Alien Enemies Act to deport alleged criminals, he got a green-light on his firing of 16,000 probationary workers, and a federal judge said this morning that illegals must register with the government.

WINNER: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott Insists on Competent Elections
Sometimes it’s the little things. Gov. Greg Abbott has been the target of threats from the Democrats who run the U.S. House and the Texas Democrat Party, both of whom whined that he delayed in calling a special election to replace former U.S. Congressman and Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner, who died on March 5. Democrats charged that Abbott didn’t call the election in order to bolster the Republican majority in the House, which is now at five.

But, as Abbott points out, it is never a good idea to rush for an election in Harris County — the poster child for election incompetence. Among Harris County’s elections’ golden hits are the time they decided, during COVID-19, that it would be OK to keep the polls open all night and allow drive-through voting. Poll workers would simply walk out to the car and hand out ballots. Forget those silly ideas about secret ballots, or prohibitions against consulting with others about how you should vote. It was the worst idea since Texas’ old drive-in margarita stands.

In 2022, Harris County provided more examples of chronic ineptitude. They had voting machines that didn’t work, they failed to have voters registered, resulting in thousands more people voting than were registered, voters had to wait in long lines and then, they ran out of ballots. If that wasn’t enough, after the polls finally closed, it took them more than 24 hours to count the votes.

Abbott called the Special Election for Congressional District 18 this week, to be held Nov. 4. Democrats will have a vacant seat in the U.S. House until then, but that’s on Harris County. Sen. Paul Bettencourt has spent years passing election integrity laws to get Harris County on track. It is time that county election officials follow his lead.

WINNER: A-F Grades for Texas Schools

When former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush began public school reforms in Florida back in the 2000s, he frequently said that nothing had made a bigger difference in getting parents and communities engaged in education than giving the schools a grade — A-F — just like students get, based on how the school performs. Schools where students could read and do math got a better grade than schools where most children were failing to learn basic skills. Passing an A-F accountability ranking made sense to Texas conservative lawmakers back then, but efforts to get it passed were thwarted year after year by Texas teacher unions, which insisted that it wasn’t fair to hold a school accountable for performance. The unions said that students who got poor grades would be traumatized and predicted that all the wealthy schools would get good grades and all the poor schools would get bad grades.

 

Democrats and the teachers unions aggressively fought the A-F legislation over several sessions, but it finally passed in 2017 and the first A-F accountability rankings were released in 2018. Everybody, especially parents, loved them, and guess what? All the A-rated schools weren’t in wealthy districts and all the failing schools weren’t in poor districts.

 

In deep blue Democrat districts throughout the state, when a local school got an A, everyone showed up for the photo op, including lawmakers who’d fought tooth and nail against A-F.

However, a new day had not dawned. After COVID-19, the accountability rankings were dropped for a while, because schools were in such disarray. Then, as the Texas Education Agency (TEA) prepared to release the latest list, over 100 Texas school districts took them to Court to stop it. But this week a judge at the 15th Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the TEA and the A-F grades for schools should be coming out in the next couple weeks. If this report card is anything like what we saw in 2018, there will be surprises. Take a look. They will be posted here.

 

WINNER: University of Austin Wants Smart Kids

The very smart and always innovative people at the newly established University of Austin came up with a novel idea this week — they will automatically admit any student who scores 1460+ on the SAT, 33+ on the ACT, or 105+ on the CLT. Students will not get extra points if they write an essay explaining how a minuscule amount of indigenous DNA or their racial or gender identity gives them special insight into how the world works. They also won’t be able to cut the line by reporting how they spent their summer tracking threatened bird life at the shore or joining two dozen extra-curricular clubs their senior year.

If you open the UATX website, the words “DARE TO THINK” booms across the home page. In making their announcement on merit-based admissions, university officials said, “We care about two things: Intelligence and courage.”

UATX leaders called the current college admissions system “broken,” saying it rewards manipulation, not merit and too often comes down to identity group and connections. They don’t care about any of that. They just want to recruit smart kids.

LOSER: Men in Women’s Sports
There are a surprising number of people who advocate allowing men to participate in women’s sports, who frequently insist that men who think they are women represent only an infinitesimal percentage of the population. That may be true, but their impact on sports is not insignificant.

A United Nations report last year found that as of March, 2024, over 600 female athletes in more than 400 competitions lost more than 800 medals in 29 different sports. That was a year ago. Now it feels like we are seeing it every day. Just this week there was the inspiring fencer who refused to compete against a man and the disc golfer who followed her lead and walked off the course rather than play against a man. In England, the two finalists in the Ultimate Pool Women’s Pro-Series were men. Many female athletes, including tennis great Marina Navratilova, are outspoken in the fight to keep men out of women’s sports, but South Carolina Women’s Basketball Coach Dawn Staley, an icon in women’s sports, is not among them. Staley insists that men who say they are women should be allowed to compete in women’s games.

It’s petty on my part, but I admit Staley’s position was one reason I cheered on Sunday night when UConn walloped South Carolina in the national championship game.

LOSER: Democrats in Texas
The Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee announced this week that they will target U.S. Rep. Monica De La Cruz, R-Texas, who represents McAllen and Hidalgo County, in next year’s mid-term elections. De La Cruz defeated her Democrat opponent by 15 points last year, but Democrats seem to believe De La Cruz will be easier to beat without Trump on the ballot. De La Cruz supports Trump’s immigration policies — which remain enormously popular in South Texas. Meanwhile, almost every Democrat in the U.S. House this week voted against the SAVE Act, sponsored by U.S. Rep. Chip Roy, which will require voters show proof of citizenship before they can register. More than 80% of Americans support the requirement. With that record, what do Democrats think they can run on that will defeat De La Cruz?

WINNER: Nick Saban Nominated for Sports Emmy
Well, maybe he’s a winner. Nick Saban stunned the sports world when it was announced this week that he has been nominated for a Sports Emmy for his work on College Game Day after only a year on the show. Saban seemed to easily make the leap from coach to commentator, and College Game Day had its best year ever with Saban in the mix. Will keep you posted on the award.

LOSER: Buying College Sports
The Wall Street Journal published a story this week in which a financial analyst asserts that even though Florida defeated University of Houston on Monday to claim the NCAA national basketball championship title, if the teams were for sale, Florida’s value would be about $121 million, about a third as much as Duke is worth ($370 million). The fact that UofH beat Duke to get into the championship game is not a factor, either.

The analyst, Ryan Brewer, a finance professor at Indiana University, says he came up with his numbers by studying revenues and cash flows and making a financial projection about the team’s sustainability. He insists it’s no different than analyzing any other business. According to his data, UofH is valued at $81 million, far less than several Texas teams including the University of Texas, which didn’t make the tournament this year. Brewer puts UT’s valuation at $153 million. Texas Tech is at $102 million and Texas A&M is at $95 million. Brewer doesn’t explain why his list of women’s team valuations has national champion UConn at the top at $95 million and South Carolina, last year’s national champion, in the number two spot with $86 million.

What is very concerning about this analysis is the glib discussion of selling college athletic teams. This is a terrible idea. The current monetization of college sports, including new NIL rules, the transfer portal and the increasing domination of rich schools over poorer ones is not sustainable. It will funnel all the revenue to a few schools and dramatically narrow the field of competition to the universities that can afford to buy the best players. Because football and men’s basketball bring in more than 90% of the sports funding for universities, the impact will result in no funding for other sports like soccer and tennis and certainly women’s sports.

Happily, the Masters Tournament will be on this weekend, and we’ll undoubtedly have lots of glorious shots from the magnificent Augusta Golf Course to take our minds off the turbulent week.

Have a great weekend!

 

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Sign up to receive this in your inbox every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.

Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on AppleSpotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

Categories
Sherry Sylvester Show

The Sherry Sylvester Show | Episode 39: Making Good Citizens at Texas A&M with Ben Crockett

TPPF’s Sherry Sylvester welcomes Ben Crockett, a Texas A&M political science senior and key player in the Citizenship and Service Initiative. With internships at TPPF and States Trust under his belt, Ben shares how A&M is rethinking higher education with four pillars: knowledge, civic character, skills, and engagement. From testifying at the Capitol to fostering civil discourse, he’s helping shape Aggies into confident citizens. Plus, hear how this counters DEI trends and why A&M’s balanced student body stands out.

Listen to the Sherry Sylvester Show on Apple or Spotify.

Subscribe to the 9th & Congress newsletter.

Categories
Winners & Losers

Winners & Losers: ESAs, Tesla Protests and the Final Four

Every Friday morning, I join the Cardle & Woolley Show on 1370 Talk Radio in Austin to announce the week’s Winners & Losers. With less than 60 days to go in the Legislative Session and two Texas teams in the Final Four tournaments this weekend, the already-hectic pace is approaching light speed. Here’s who made the list:

Winner: Texas Parents, Texas Kids

Every step on the road to Education Savings Accounts for Texas is a big win for parental rights and Texas students. The Texas Senate passed Education Savings Accounts early in the session and the Texas House Education Committee passed the bill out this week, so it’s on to the House floor for a full vote. If you know anyone who is still weighing the facts, give them this checklist put together by TPPF.

Loser: The Tesla Takedown

Progressives may be gloating that they managed to defeat Elon Musk’s candidate for the Wisconsin Supreme Court this week, but in terms of swaying public opinion their way, the whole notion of torching perfectly good cars is just not selling with the American people. Last weekend’s national demonstrations against Tesla dealerships drew hundreds, not even thousands, in a country of nearly 375 million people. In terms of pressing priorities, making Elon Musk a tiny bit less rich is just not high on the list of normal people.

Sure, there are reports that Tesla sales have plummeted since Musk took over DOGE and started cutting spending for the Trump administration, but that doesn’t mean anything either. Teslas were always a virtue-signaling luxury item that primarily appealed to progressive tastes. It wouldn’t take many self-righteous lefties to cause sales to dip.

Compare that to the way Americans toppled Bud Light from the top of the beer charts. Folks simply decided to buy a beer that didn’t have a man pretending to be a woman in the commercials. No marches were needed.

The tepid Tesla Takedown is one more sign that what used to be called the “protest movement,” is over in this country. The anti-Israel, pro-Hamas marches that have been happening since Israel was attacked in 2023 have had no impact on American support for Israel, which remains at almost 80%. Instead, the demonstrations have provided a wake-up call to anti-Semitism on American campuses.

Progressives hold protest marches all the time, because they don’t seem to know what else to do. They are gatherings of the same frequently misinformed people who apparently do not work and don’t have anything better to do. They can’t even be bothered to come up with an original chant. How many times do we have to hear “Hey hey, ho ho INSERT WHAT YOU DON’T LIKE HERE, Has Got to Go.” Note to the left: Nobody is paying attention.

Winner: Ted Cruz on Trump’s Third Term

There’s no way to know if President Trump is serious when he says he is considering a third term, but Texas Sen. Ted Cruz minced no words last week when asked about it, telling NBC News: “The 22nd Amendment is clear and unequivocal.”

America went through one of its darkest and most stagnant periods in recent history under former President Joe Biden and Trump’s engagement with the country, his high energy and focus are such a stark contrast that it is easy for some to say that they never want him to leave. But when asked, almost 70 percent of Americans believe, like Cruz, that the Constitution has served us well on this and we should stick with it. Here’s the 22nd Amendment:

“No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.”

Loser: Cory Booker and Everyone Who Had to Listen to Him

U.S. Sen. Cory Booker, D-New Jersey, used to be a kind of good guy. When I lived in New Jersey decades ago, he was elected mayor of Newark at least in part because he supported school choice. But Mayor Booker is not the same guy as Sen. Booker, who decided on Monday that it was time for his “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” moment, so he decided to break the U.S. Senate’s filibuster record. Sen. Booker wasn’t fighting for any principle or policy—he just wanted to prove that he could talk for 25 hours straight.

In yet another sign of how bad things are in the Democrat party, Booker is now seen by some as the leading contender for the Democrat presidential nomination in 2028 as a result of the stunt. Go figure.

Winner: Tilman Fertitta

President Trump nominated Houstonian Tilman Fertitta to be his ambassador to Italy, and his confirmation hearing in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in Washington, D.C., this week was a hit. Introduced by both Texas U.S. senators, John Cornyn and Ted Cruz, Fertitta is expected to be easily confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Fertitta, who owns the Houston Rockets, has a lot to celebrate this week. He chairs the Board of Regents at the University of Houston, which made it to the Final Four and is playing for the national championship this weekend.

Loser: Equality Texas Anti-DEI Poll

Equality Texas, the group that is fighting to let men play women’s sports and put drag shows for kids in public libraries, among other things, released an astonishing poll this week.

According to its data, 52% of LGBTQ students surveyed at Texas colleges and universities said they considered leaving whatever Texas institution they attended after Texas’ anti-DEI law passed in 2023. Even worse, according to Equality Texas, 78% said they’d considered leaving the Lone Star State entirely.

Equality Texas reports that it only surveyed 23 students and they provided no information on how that 23 was selected. So let’s do the math: 78% of 23 means that 18 of the 1.6 million Texas college students are thinking of leaving Texas because of DEI. What about faculty? There have been frequent warnings that Texas DEI law will drive away potential faculty members. However, the Equality Texas survey reached out to 21 faculty and staff members and found that 25% of them said they had “considered” leaving Texas—so that’s 5.25 people.

Winner: Men’s Final Four in San Antonio

The University of Houston is the only Texas team that made it all the way to the NCAA Men’s Final Four in San Antonio. The Cougars play Duke at 8 p.m. Saturday. For many fans, the fact that all four No. 1 seeds—Florida and Auburn are the other two teams—made it to the Final Four is one more sign that dramatic changes in college sports have pushed many schools out of the real competition. More than a few people wonder if the NIL, the portal and big money schools getting all the good players has resulted in an NCAA tournament with few upsets and no Cinderella teams. If you have not read TPPF board member Cody Campbell’s cutting-edge analysis on the current threats to college sports, read it here now.

UPDATE! The University of Houston defeated Duke in the Final Four game last night. After being down by 9 points with 3 minutes to go, they pulled off what the Houston Chronicle called “a comeback for the ages.” They will play Florida for the national championship on Monday. 

Winner: Texas Women in the Final Four

The Longhorns will play in the NCAA Women’s Final Four in Tampa on Friday night going up against their nemesis, South Carolina, at 6 p.m. The Longhorns beat another Texas team, TCU to get the ticket to Tampa. Texas famously ended South Carolina’s 57 game winning streak in February, but the Gamecocks got a revenge win over Texas in the SEC Championship tournament last month. The University of Connecticut and UCLA are also playing on Friday.

The women’s championship game is on Sunday night and the men’s game is on Monday. Let’s root for both Texas teams to come home with trophies.

Have a great weekend!

 

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Sign up to receive this in your inbox every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.

Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on AppleSpotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

Categories
Winners & Losers

Winners & Losers: Trump Cheers Women, Texas Fights Fat & Tech Wins Big!

Every Friday morning, I join the Cardle & Woolley Show on 1370 Talk Radio in Austin to announce the week’s Winners & Losers. With Women’s History Month coming to a close and March Madness trickling down to the Elite Eight, here’s who made the list:

Winner: Trump’s Women’s History Month Speech at the White House

It would have been easy to miss President Donald Trump’s White House speech on Women’s History Month this week where he joked that if whoever said he didn’t like strong women (it was Mark Cuban) was right, he is in real trouble, because he is surrounded by them. As he pointed out the women on his team—including Susie Wiles, the first woman to serve as White House Chief of Staff—along with the dozens of Republican women leaders around the country, he demonstrated what a fool Cuban was, without ever saying his name.

Mainstream coverage of the event was mostly snide, as it always is when Trump directly challenges what is a given in the left-wing narrative—that he is sexist. I am sure lefty pundits are studying his comments right now, trying to find something they can use to demonstrate that he hates women. Perhaps they will distort his jocular comment that he knows women are superior to men: “I’ve known it all my life, I don’t like it, but I know it.” They also may belittle the fact that he said he had ended the Democrats’ “war on women” and called his edict proclaiming that there are only two genders in America one of his major accomplishments. He said “no matter how many surgeries you have or chemicals you inject, if you’re born with male DNA in your body, you can never become a woman.”

Trump noted that Democrats simply do not understand how important this issue is to real women. The reason he was finally able to break through with the women’s vote is that those who fought for women’s rights over the years—from establishing Title IX to reforming rape laws—are offended by the notion that some man can simply declare himself to be a woman and land a spot on the volleyball team, or whatever. Trump joked that he hopes Democrats continue to fail to get it. Me too.

Loser: National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service

Before Democrat strategist James Carville said “it’s the economy, stupid,” he described the established Democrat party as the “Volvo driving, white wine drinking, National Public Radio crowd.” That was over 30 years ago and even Carville knew back then that elitist public media sources did not reflect the American people—which wouldn’t be a problem if they were a private company, but public broadcasting is taxpayer funded. The heads of NPR and PBS appeared before a Congressional committee this week and if you are wondering why we are even discussing this, the budget Congress passed the other day includes over $500 million for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which passes the funding along to NPR and PBS.

The fight isn’t really about money; it’s about progressives wanting an official broadcasting tool to misinform the country. NPR persistently reported that any discussion about the origin of COVID-19 was racist, that President Trump colluded with Russia to win in 2016, and that Hunter Biden’s laptop was not an actual news story.

Katherine Maher, the head of NPR, told members of Congress that she’d “never seen any instance of political bias at NPR.” What is so pathetic about that statement is that it is probably true. She just doesn’t see it.

I talk with reporters all the time, from mainstream media outlets in Texas and, like Maher, they honestly don’t see the bias in what they report and what they choose not to report, even in the words they choose to adopt. If you call an Education Savings Account a “voucher” or a man who says he’s a woman “her,” or a pregnant mom a “birthing person,” you have taken a position before you even begin the report. To hand one side of a debate the right to define the terms is journalistic malpractice.

To see how this works in real time, note that CNN’s report on the hearing mocked the congressional members who said the public broadcasting outlets were biased. Similarly, Politico reported that the hearing was an attack on freedom of the press. We don’t know the political make-up of CNN’s or Politico’s reporters, but the 87 writers at NPR are all registered Democrats. There are no Republicans.

Congress should claw back the millions in the new budget. We don’t need a line item for state-funded media. Anyone who is worried about Downton Abbey or Big Bird should know that all the good shows will be picked up in a week by Netflix and Amazon.

One more thing in case you missed it. Texas Congressman Brendan Gill, from Flower Mound, stole the show with his questions to the NPR head, Maher, as she repeatedly denied having said things she’d actually tweeted. For example during the BLM riots she tweeted “it’s hard to be mad” about the damage to businesses because private property is part of “a system of oppression founded on treating people’s ancestors as private property.” Maher claimed she didn’t say it, but Gill had the receipts.

Loser: Military Leaders Text Chain on Signal

Conservatives should stop pulling punches on the leaked text chain that inadvertently included a reporter in classified conversations with high ranking military officials. It was stupid beyond belief. There is no excuse. Stop shrugging it off and saying “mistakes happen.” Stop whining about all the security breaches on the left and the fact that mainstream media is treating the story as if it were bigger than Watergate. You can expect that—when you do something so absolutely dumb.

Trump is being gracious, but it wouldn’t be a bad idea if he expressed a little anger. We lived through four years of incompetence in the White House. Conservatives promised to fix that, and this was a big fail.

That said, it is important to remember that if there was a security breach, it came from the reporter, Jeffrey Goldberg, who was accidentally included on the text chain. If anyone’s life was put in danger or America’s strategic position in the world was compromised, that’s on him. He had the information, he had lots of options including working with the principals on the call. Instead, he ran to the newsroom to put the story out and undoubtedly assumes he’s at the front of the line for a Pulitzer.

Winner: Marco Rubio Pulls Hamas-niks’ Visas

Homeland Security arrested another student who was working with Hamas during the recent campus protests—Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish national and doctoral student at Tufts University in Boston. This follows the arrest of Mahmoud Kalil at Columbia University who was arrested last week. The idea that the protesters were not collaborating with Hamas last year is outlandish—even at the University of Texas where the protests were quickly contained, law enforcement officials found Palestinian propaganda supporting the genocide of Jews. Hamas is still holding an American hostage and they killed several Americans along with Israelis, so it is very reasonable to disqualify their allies from holding a guest visa to be in the country. Secretary of State Rubio said it succinctly:

“We do it every day. Every time I find one of these lunatics, I take away their visas.”

Winner: Making Texas Healthy Again

Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, R-Brenham, is the author of Senate Bill 25 that would increase the number of hours that Texas public school children spend in physical education classes, a first step toward getting healthier. Sen. Mayes Middleton, R-Galveston, has proposed Senate Bill 379, which will prohibit the use of federal food supplement funding administered by the state for junk food—soda, chips and cookies.

In a statement that harkens back to the tobacco companies of yesteryear, when they insisted that smoking doesn’t cause cancer, the American Beverage Association said this week that “soda is not driving obesity in America.”

Actually, sugary soda is a major contributing factor to the fatness that is killing too many Americans. U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins, a Texan and former TPPF CEO, noted this week that soda is the No. 1 item purchased with food stamps.

You can understand that the beverage producers would be against this—they call it the “government food police,” but some advocates for poor people are also fighting it, saying it will be difficult for grocery stores to figure out what is covered.

Uh, no, it won’t. They already sort that out all the time. It seems like they may oppose the healthy agenda just because it is being pushed by President Trump and conservative lawmakers who want to make Texans healthy again.

Loser: U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett Sets Hair on Fire

It was a big week for the Dallas congresswoman who helped ramp up the attacks of vandalism on Tesla dealerships by saying that Elon Musk should be taken down. Attorney General Pam Bondi told her to tone it down. Then she mocked the bans on boys playing girls sports, an issue that has the support of 80% of Americans including a majority in her party, insisting it’s not a problem and saying “find the poor little trans child that is ruining your life.”

But then she made fun of Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, who uses a wheelchair, calling him “Governor ‘Hot Wheels.’” Even the uber-hateful women on The View were outraged, telling Crockett she should never mock people’s disabilities.

Crockett ignored all that, insisting she didn’t say it, even though it’s very clear that she did. The Dallas Morning News also criticized the local congresswoman, but to keep it balanced, they concluded that the whole “Hot Wheels” situation was actually Trump’s fault.

Gov. Abbott was gracious, calling it just one more disaster by Democrats. Crockett is clearly trying to topple Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) and take over the comedy relief spot for progressive Democrats, but she didn’t get any closer to that goal this week.

Winner: Texas Senate Passes Bill on the Horrors of Communism

One of Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick’s priorities this session is Senate Bill 24, which will require that Texas public school students be educated on the horrors of communism. A number of important bills passed the Texas Senate this week and the Texas House is putting together a calendar for next week, but this bill resonated with me because I recently testified before the Senate Education Committee on a panel with Dr. Carrie Butler, a professor on sabbatical from Stephen F. Austin University who told the senators that very few of her students knew the difference between communism and capitalism.

This ignorance among younger people is at the root of the demonstrations we have been seeing on college campuses across the country. It makes sense that Texas require public school students to learn about the crimes against humanity perpetrated by communist regimes.

March Madness Update – Tech

Texas Tech’s Red Raiders provided what may be the most exciting March Madness game so far when they made an amazing comeback against Arkansas last night. They were behind most of the game and at one point trailed by 16 points, but they took the Razorbacks into overtime and won with a buzzer beater at the finish. They are moving onto the Elite Eight.

All the other Texas teams that made it through last week are still in Sweet Sixteen match-ups. The University of Houston plays Purdue tonight. On the women’s bracket, the University of Texas plays Tennessee tomorrow and TCU will play Notre Dame.

That’s a wrap. Have a great weekend!

 

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Sign up to receive this in your inbox every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.

Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on AppleSpotify or wherever you get your podcasts.