Every Friday morning, I join the Cardle & Wooley Show on Talk 1370 Radio in Austin to announce the week’s Winners & Losers. The government is still shut down, and members of the military won’t be getting their paychecks next week, but in case you were worried, the members of Congress (the same people who won’t even talk about ending the shutdown) will still be getting paid. Here’s who made the list:
WINNER: Trump’s Peace Plan in Gaza
No place on earth is trickier than the Middle East, but Trump’s Peace Plan has been accepted by both Hamas and Israel. And while details are still being worked out, the Wall Street Journal reports that both sides are hopeful and moving forward. Israel says it has withdrawn from parts of Gaza, and the 72-hour clock is now counting down for Hamas to release the hostages.
It is hard to imagine anyone but President Trump getting this done, although so far, accolades are coming reluctantly. A New York Times columnist reluctantly suggests that Trump could claim the right to a Nobel Peace Prize for the accomplishment, but, so far, only Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman from the Democrat side has given the President a high five.
Norway, the country where they award the peace prizes, expressed worry yesterday that Trump might throw a fit if he didn’t get the prestigious award. The leader of the socialist party in Oslo said the country should be prepared for anything, because Trump is so volatile and authoritarian. They want to make sure Trump knows that Norway doesn’t officially have anything to do with who gets the prize, in case Trump was thinking of invading or dropping a bomb or something.
This morning, the Nobel crowd announced that the Peace Prize would be awarded to Maria Corina Machado, who has been fighting the authoritarian regime in Venezuela. Machado immediately dedicated her award to the people of her country and to President Trump, for his “decisive support of our cause.” She clearly understands what matters better than the Nobel Peace Prize committee, which essentially said they don’t like the President’s style.
Apparently, style is a big part of the whole “peace prize” thing. The Peace Prize Committee ignored the guy who brought the Abraham Accords to the Middle East and laid the groundwork for the ceasefire agreement today while making such a big deal about giving the prize to former President Barack Obama in 2009 for doing nothing.
LOSER: Were Biden’s Antics Worse than Watergate?
The more we hear about what was happening while former President Joe Biden was in office, the more outrageous it becomes. This past week, emails surfaced from the CIA with Ukrainian complaints about how incompetent Biden’s diplomatic efforts were in regard to their country. Ukrainian leaders also didn’t trust dealings with Biden because of the highly questionable business activities of his son, Hunter. The kicker on these revelations is that Biden officials demanded that the CIA bury the Ukrainian emails.
We also learned this week that Biden and his henchmen ordered the monitoring of phone calls of eight Republican senators—including Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, Josh Hawley of Missouri and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. Some have said the outrage of a sitting president surveilling the phone records of members of Congress is worse than Watergate, and it clearly is. After all, Watergate was actually about stealing campaign plans—something that is pretty much standard practice today. Getting the phone records of members of the opposition party is a huge affront to all our Constitutional rights.
This comes on top of what we learned last week, about Biden requiring flash cards with photos to remember who he was talking to—Hillary Clinton, Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-New York, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Illinois. There’s no way to know whether he understood that he’d signed off on going after the phone records of the GOP lawmakers. But if he didn’t sign off, who did?
WINNER: Texas Tech and UT Audit of Gender Identity Classes
Let’s be clear, gender identity isn’t a real thing. The idea that individuals are born neutral and turn into males or females depending on how they are reared is, frankly, nuts. Gender identity advocates believe that girls are girls because their parents encourage them to behave like girls. Presumably, if their parents encouraged them to behave like boys—they’d be boys. Their core belief is that your gender is “arbitrarily assigned at birth.”
Most Texans don’t agree, so the recent winning move by Texas Tech and the University of Texas at Austin to examine the so-called “gender identity” classes on campuses is long overdue. Last year, during the debate over the passage of Senate Bill 37, a cursory review of the course catalog at UT revealed over 400 courses with the word “gender” in the title.
That’s because once you accept the premise that gender is arbitrary, it permeates every aspect of study—the role of gender in the agricultural patterns of southwest America—the role of gender in defining color-blindness in dogs, whatever. A new curriculum emerges and dozens of gender theory professors are required to teach it. It’s a grift. It’s a racket. Good for Tech and UT for going after it.
WINNER: Abbott Edict on Crosswalks
Gov. Greg Abbott let Austin and other cities know this week that government-sanctioned graffiti like we see in Austin including the Gay Pride crosswalk and Black Lives Matter messages have to go. The city of Austin authorized these “decorative street markings” over the past several years, but, as Abbott rightly points out, taxpayers don’t want their money being used for activist ads that they are forced to stare at while they are waiting in traffic—which they almost always are. Street propaganda is not unique to Austin. Most Democrat cities, including Houston, have them.
So far, the neither Gov. Abbott nor TXDOT have suggested the activist ads are a safety hazard, so perhaps cities could get entrepreneurial and sell the space to make much needed cash. You could imagine: “TURN LEFT HERE FOR THE BEST TACOS IN TOWN” in bright red and yellow.
LOSER: Watching Progressives Continues to Entertain
I so wanted to read a news report on a national conference of progressive Democrats entitled “Democrats Still Have No Idea What Went Wrong,” that I signed up for a free trial to Atlantic Magazine, a premier left-wing publication, to learn what happened at an conference called Persuasion 2025 in Washington, D.C., last week. (I intend to unsubscribe before they charge me, but even if I miss the deadline, I gained some interesting intel).
Austin Congressman Greg Casar, chair of the Progressive Caucus, told the group that they all had to stop blaming progressive policies for the loss of the 2024 election, even as data was circulated by another Democrat pollster showing that the ad revealing that former Vice President Kamala Harris supported sex change operations for inmates in prison (She’s for They/Them, He’s for Us) resulted in a 2.7% shift among Independent voters—a margin that amounted to victory for Trump in seven swing states.
Since the election, we have seen a few news reports of Democrats trying to regroup. California Gov. Gavin Newsom admitted it isn’t fair to have boys playing girls’ sports and Rahm Emanuel wrote a Wall Street Journal op-ed bluntly telling Democrats they need to totally re-think their stance on education. So-called “sane Democrats” like Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro and Maryland Gov. Wes Moore have become fixtures on many podcasts and news talk shows, but they are exceptions, not the rule.
According to the Atlantic, the Persuasion 2025 conference makes it startlingly clear that the stereotypes about progressive Democrats are actually true—they may love humanity, but they can’t stand people. They ignore opinion polls, insisting it doesn’t matter what people think. They think voters are simply wrong and paying attention to polls is “pollingism.”
One progressive pollster, Anat Shenker-Osorio, challenged the idea that the way to win elections is to find people who support your ideas and get them out to vote. Shenker-Osorio says that’s all wrong:
Conventional wisdom says to meet people where they are. But on most issues, where they are is unacceptable.
“Unacceptable,” is a little bit nicer than “deplorable,” but the sentiment is the same.
UPDATE WINNER: Cell Phone Ban Update
After a rocky start last month, Alamo Heights School District, in San Antonio reported this week that the school system will abide by the state cell phone ban on students, prohibiting phone use from bell to bell. Alamo Heights was one of several large San Antonio school districts that had initially defied the state ban on cell phone use for students in classes, creating a ridiculous loophole by interpreting the law to mean that students were only restricted from using their phones during class. They could still use them before, after and between classes, at lunch and virtually anytime they were out of the classroom—totally defeating the purpose of the ban.
Whether it was pressure or the fact that the cell phone ban is proving to be very popular among students, Alamo Heights has reversed course.
Northeast School District, also in San Antonio, continues to ignore the ban and the Texas Education Agency (TEA) is investigating this refusal by professional educators to do what is best for kids. Northeast ISD has essentially said to the State, “You are not the boss of me.” TPPF and many others worked hard to pass this important legislation. Stay tuned.
LOSER: Sentence in Kavanaugh Assassination Attempt
It was outrageous this week that the man who attacked Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was only sentenced to eight years for the crime. It is also outrageous that the media seems to have completely forgotten he is a man.
It is not completely clear how Nicholas Roske became Sophie Roske during the time he has been awaiting trial for the attempted under of Kavanaugh, but virtually all the legacy news reporting this week on the sentencing said that Kavanaugh was attacked by a woman, even though the person who traveled from California with a knife and a Glock to kill Kavanaugh was a man.
During the sentencing, Roske became the victim in the story when the judge said that one reason the sentence was so light is Roske will be held in a male prison. The judge noted that life for “trans woman” is particularly difficult in male prisons, suggesting that eight years should count for more—like dog years or something.
WINNER: Columbus Day “We’re Back, Italians”
The long travail is finally over—Columbus Day is back, just in time for “Columbus Day.” Trump officially proclaimed the end of politically correct “Indigenous Peoples Day,” today and the country can now move forward out of the murky confusion.
Winners & Losers: Red River Shoot Out, Aggies & Raiders
Perhaps the less said the better about the Red River Shootout and the battle for the Golden Hat tomorrow as the undefeated Oklahoma Sooners, ranked No. 6 in the nation, come to the Cotton Bowl to face the Longhorns (who barely came out of The Swamp alive last week). Texas, with a record of 3-2 has dropped out of the top 25 national rankings and Oklahoma is picked to win it—but you never know in a rivalry game like this so Hook‘em. Kickoff is at 3:30.
Meanwhile, Texas A&M, ranked No. 5 in the nation, will play Florida, but they are in College Station. Texas Tech continues to move up the charts, now at No. 9. They are playing Kansas.
Hook ‘em! Gig ‘em! Wreck ‘em!
Have a great weekend.
Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.
Listen to Winners & Losers on Talk 1370, the Cardle & Woolley show, every Friday morning at 8:30 AM. Here’s the listen live link.
If you were forwarded this email, you can sign up to receive it every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.
Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on Apple, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.