Categories
Sherry Sylvester Show

Sherry Sylvester Show Ep. 47 | Is Landman a Conservative TV Show? Feat. Brian Phillips & Michaelanne Hurst 

The New Yorker said Taylor Sheridan’s Landman demonstrates “how conservative TV might be a damn good time.” TPPF’s Sherry Sylvester invites Landman superfans Brian Phillips and Michaelanne Hurst to the show to assess the series’ core themes (hint: it’s not just about the oil industry).

Listen to the Sherry Sylvester Show on Apple & Spotify

Categories
Winners & Losers

Winners & Losers: Abbott’s $100 million, Trump’s Peace Prize & the Immigration War

Every Friday morning, I join the Cardle & Woolley Show on Talk 1370 Radio in Austin to announce the week’s Winners & Losers. President Donald Trump finally has a Peace Prize, Texas has a team in the Super Bowl hunt and it looks like Verizon is working again. Here’s who made the list:

WINNER: Gov. Greg Abbott’s $106 Million Campaign War Chest

In what the Dallas Morning News calls a “chest-thumping number,” Texas Gov. Greg Abbott officially reported this week that he has a total of $106 million on hand for his re-election campaign this year—a figure that withers any efforts by Democrats to take over the Governor’s Mansion anytime soon. Note that Texas House Democrats bragged this week that they have raised a little over $2 million, mostly from folks around the country who supported their Capitol walkout last year. The Texas Democrat big dog, Beto O’Rourke, who has declined to run for anything again, also raised $2 million. Democrat U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico has raised over $6 million and his opponent, Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett, reportedly has close to that amount, although her progressive allies are currently criticizing her for taking money from the wrong people.

Which is not to say that it is all about the money—or even mostly about the money. Abbott’s broad support from the business community of Texas is a clear sign that people like the direction the state is going—job creation, productivity increases and, of course, Abbott’s lead role in passing school choice last year. The response from Texans is “let’s keep going.” Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick also broke campaign fundraising records reporting $38 million on hand for his re-election. Both Abbott and Patrick are running for fourth terms.

WINNER: Maria Machado Gives Her Nobel Peace Prize to Trump

After the Nobel Committee passed over President Trump in October, I reported that peace prizes are not usually awarded on merit—(see Barack Obama). But sometimes they are. Yesterday, Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado gave her Nobel Peace Prize medal to President Donald Trump, expressing gratitude to Trump for taking out dictator Nicolas Maduro, and for his support of the resistance movement.

Bloomberg says that Norway is stunned by the news that Machado gave her prize to Trump after they specifically told her it was not transferable.

According to the news report, “a sense of disbelief gripped the Norwegian media and expert community”—don’t you love that Scandinavians have a “media and expert community?”

Janne Haaland Matlary, a professor with the University of Oslo and a former politician said, “That’s completely unheard of. It’s a total lack of respect for the award, on her part.” [It is] “meaningless” and “pathetic.”

Of course, Dr. Matlary has it backwards. “Meaningless and pathetic” are what the Nobel Peace Prize has become. Machado has made it relevant again.

LOSER: Immigration Wars in the Streets

We are accustomed to living in a world in which half the people have a viewpoint that is diametrically opposed to the other half. The immigration wars going on in the streets of Minneapolis now are a stark example.

There is no question that the progressive left had been looking for a “George Floyd” moment and they believe they got it when an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer shot and killed Renee Good on Jan. 7. Fully 80% of Americans say they have watched all the videos of the shootings and most everyone has an opinion.

A strong majority—over half—do not believe the ICE agent was justified in using deadly force against Good.

Meanwhile, the same poll shows that just over 60% of Republicans believe the shooting was justified. Almost all Democrats—over 90%— do not, which means that the country has settled into their camps on this issue, before there has been any investigation.

There are lots of arguments we would all like to hurl at the progressive anti-ICE marchers, starting with why they never seem to get mobilized in response to victims who have been killed by illegals, but it is also fair to ask for an investigation to determine why this woman was killed by a law enforcement official. Unfortunately, by the time the investigation gets moving, people will be even more dug in. Nobody is going to win the immigration war in the streets. Everybody is a loser.

LOSER: Verizon’s “Software Issue”

If we needed more evidence of how our fragile world is held together by our cellular service, it came on Wednesday when Verizon’s system went down for about 7 hours—people with Verizon phones couldn’t call out and nobody could call them.

Verizon couldn’t tell you how many of their customers lost service, only saying that 1.5 million people reached out to them to complain. I kept wondering how they could complain if their phone wasn’t working—which is why I suspect it was many more than 1.5 million.

Verizon called it a “software issue,” not a cyberattack, but the reports from other cell phone companies all seemed a little shaky. AT&T and T-Mobile said some customers reported problems to them, but they think it was only because they were trying to call Verizon people. Shouldn’t they know whether their systems are working or not?

Verizon is offering $20 credit to people who were affected, but speaking in solidarity with Verizon customers, I don’t think that will nearly cover the pain and suffering.

LOSER: Crockett Has a Bad Week

Woke apologies are pretty much over, everywhere except in Hollywood and among progressive Democrats, which is apparently why two comedians apologized to Texas U.S. Senate candidate Jasmine Crockett this week for telling voters they should not waste their money on contributions to her campaign.

Two guys nobody has heard of, Bowen Yang and Matt Rogers, described by their compatriots as “white and white adjacent,” went on Instagram to say how sorry they were to have been insensitive, shortly after they were accused of attacking Crockett because she is a black woman.

In addition to the fundraising story noted above, Crockett has not had a great week. The first real poll in the U.S. Senate Democrat primaries from Emerson College shows State Rep. James Talarico, D-Austin leads Crockett 47% to 38%. Pollsters say that Talarico is leading among white and Hispanic voters, while Crockett has about 80% of black voters.

LOSER: Bill & Hillary Clinton Duck Subpoena

Granted, nobody really expected former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to show up on Capitol Hill this week to answer questions about what they knew about Jeffrey Epstein.

The Clintons called the whole thing a “witch hunt,” a term frequently employed by the current president, and they insisted they’d already told everything they know.

Well, maybe, but I don’t believe we have gotten to the bottom of those silky silver shirts that the former President and Epstein are wearing in the most recent set of photographs that were released earlier this year.

House Oversight Chair James Comer, R-Kentucky, is moving forward to hold them in contempt of Congress, but that probably won’t make much difference. It is already pretty clear they have nothing but contempt for Congress.

WINNER: More Evidence the Whole Trans Thing is Over

Now that the U.S. Supreme Court is finally considering whether boys should be allowed to participate in girls’ sports, one of my colleagues on the radio version of Winners & Losers actually made the Supreme Court losers this week because the justices wasted so much time asking the pro-trans lawyers dumb questions that all boiled down to what a woman is.

But cultural change is a long process, and if the reading of the tea leaves is correct and the Supremes are poised to block boys and men from playing in girls and women’s sports, this will be an important victory for our women, our values and culture and our country. Since all that is at stake, the Supreme Court was right to push the ACLU attorneys for the details of their case—they need to put their case on record, even if the Court’s liberal justices, aside from Ketanji Brown Jackson, did not seem inclined to join in.

Just in case the Supremes don’t actNevada’s governor is collecting signatures to put a Trans ban on the ballot in the Silver State. Meanwhile, in San Antonio, they are still fighting for rainbow sidewalks.

LOSER: Shake Shack Gaining Ground in Texas

News reports came out this week that another Shake Shack is going up in Leander, forcing speculation that the New York City-based hamburger joint is trying to oust Whataburger from the No. 1 burger spot in Texas.

Granted, there are only 30 Shake Shacks in Texas now, compared to about 800 Whataburgers, but Texans cannot be complacent. Now that red meat is back on the top of the food pyramid, we cannot let some New York ground beef restaurant spawned in the middle of Manhattan threaten Texas’ iconic Whataburger.

It is true some folks believe that Whataburger lost its claim to a Texas title after it sold controlling interest to a Chicago company. But Whataburger is still headquartered in my hometown of San Antonio, and they are bullish about maintaining their Texas brand—and we all should help them. You can’t just show up in the Lone Star State, throw up a hamburger stand and say you belong here.

WINNER: College Football Championship & Super Bowl Speculation

Indiana will play the University of Miami on Monday night for the College Football Championship. To review how we got here, pull up the last 15 weeks of Winners & Losers.It’s a great story. Kick-off is at 6:30 p.m., Texas time.

Meanwhile, Super Bowl Sunday is Feb. 8, but the Elite 8 is set, so it’s time to start official speculation. Let’s begin with the projection model at the New York Times which somehow calculates that the Seattle Seahawks have the highest percentage chance—23% of the eight teams still in the fight—to win the Super Bowl. The Times ranks the NFC higher than the AFC and give the Rams the second highest chance. They give the Texans a 10% chance to win—the Patriots and the Broncos do a little better in the AFC.

Have a great weekend!

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Sign up to receive this in your inbox every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.

Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on AppleSpotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

Categories
Winners & Losers

Winners & Losers: Maduro’s in Jail, Somali’s Steal Billions and Red Meat is Back on the Menu

Every Friday morning, I join the Cardle & Woolley Show on Talk 1370 Radio in Austin to announce the week’s Winners & Losers. The holidays are totally over now, and 2026 is up and running in earnest with big happenings all over the world—and in Texas. Here’s who made the list:

WINNER: Trump Takes Out Maduro

President Donald Trump’s capture and arrest of Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro reinforced several foundational American values and principals, but it was also another demonstration of a smaller, but important point in the world conversation—no other country has the military capability to do what we did in Caracas last weekend. Like the obliteration of Iran’s nuclear facilities, Maduro’s arrest and capture is a clear reminder to the world of America’s military supremacy. Even America’s biggest detractors (including the Democrats in Congress) should sleep better at night knowing that the good guys have all that power.

My TPPF colleague, Joshua Treviño, has made the most succinct statement on why Trump was right to take out Maduro on Jan. 3, so I am just going to quote him here from an op-ed published earlier this week in National Review:

Venezuela’s corrupt leaders got away with it for too long. They sent forth millions of their own citizenry to be trafficked, and they got away with it. They trafficked the drugs that killed and addicted millions of our neighbors and family, and they got away with it. They formed alliances with cartels dealing in goods and people, and they got away with it. They entered into the business of narco-terrorism, and they got away with it. They invited the worst enemies of the United States into the Americas — the Russians, the Chinese, the Iranians — and they got away with it. They did all this for years, and they got away with it.

This impact of Maduro’s arrest will continue to play out in the coming days—and probably for years to come—and we’ll keep watching, but there is no doubt Trump made a winning move and executed it masterfully.

America’s thinking on Trump’s action in Venezuela has been shifting all week as people get more information. Early in the week most polls showed only about a third supported the president but new numbers put out by CBS News yesterday show about half of Americans now believe the president is doing the right thing. A strong majority of Republicans supported the action from the beginning.

The president also gets a thumbs up for withdrawing from 31 United Nations organizations and 35 other international groups that push left-wing ideologies and operate contrary to American interests. The U.S. sends billions to the United Nations which they spend on programs pushing climate change, DEI and other anti-American ideas. To paraphrase former U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene on another topic, “let them hate us on their own dime.”

LOSER: Gov. Tim Walz, the Minnesota Fraud

“Tim Walz and the Minnesota Fraud,” sounds a little like a rock band. Financial shakedowns are an old tradition in the Democrat party, dating at least from President Bill Clinton, whose administration used them extensively when doling out HUD money. However, our top loser of the week, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, seems to have lifted Democrat corruption to a whole new level.

Testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform this week revealed that the state auditor knew as early as 2009 that there was extensive fraud in the welfare system in the state of Minnesota, but Gov. Walz looked the other way and nothing was done. State workers continued to raise concerns, but they were ignored.

Happily, it has finally all come crashing down, and Gov. Walz announced this week that he will not run for reelection. Hopefully, losing his job won’t be the only consequence for his ignoring the fact that billions in federal funds earmarked to feed children during the pandemic, provide services for children with autism and other special needs, provide housing for poor people and treatment for drug addicts was instead given to fraudsters in the Somali community in Minnesota.

The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board provides a good summary of what has happened so far—including charges against 90 offenders—but the best political perspective on the fraud perpetrated by the Somali community in Minnesota came from Congressman Brendan Gill, R-Texas, in that same congressional hearing.

WINNER: Another Congressional Hearing Home Run for U.S. Rep. Brendan Gill, R-Texas

We all remember when Rep. Gill took down NPR CEO Katherine Maher by reading her tweets back to her after she denied ever saying such things as “white people all feel subconsciously superior.” This week, Rep. Gill brought the same chainsaw to the congressional hearing on welfare corruption in the Somali community in Minnesota, questioning local officials about some interesting statistics:

73% of Somali community Minnesotans are on Medicaid, compared to 18% in the general community.
81% of the Somali community are on welfare. After living 10 years in Minnesota that percentage drops to 73%.
54% of Somalians are on food stamps, compared to 7% in the general community.
Rep. Gill closed by asking the officials whether Somali voters back Democrats or Republicans. The answer of course, is that they overwhelmingly vote for Democrats. It’s all here in the video. Really makes you proud when you hear Chairman James Comer say, “the Chair recognizes Mr. Gill from Texas.”

LOSER: Home Ownership is a Weapon of White Supremacy

When I was in high school, there was a sign over the water fountain that read, “What Communists Believe.” The first and only item I remember on this list was “communists believe there is no God,” which was a deal-breaker for me and my other fellow teenagers at the time, so I didn’t pay attention to what came next.

Now the Democrat Socialist mayor of New York City has appointed Cea Weaver to serve as head of his Office of Tenant Advocacy, and she’s revealed some more details about what communists believe regarding private property.

In an August 2019 tweet, which Weaver recently deleted, she wrote “Private property including and kind of ESPECIALLY homeownership is a weapon of white supremacy masquerading as ‘wealth building’ public policy.”

In 2021 Weaver said “…for centuries, we have really treated property as an individualized good and not a collective good.” Her plan is to transition to a model of shared equity in order to think about property differently. She explained what she means by saying that, “white families and some POC [people of color] families who are homeowners… are going to have a different relationship to property than the one that we currently have.”

Seeing Weaver’s words on the page doesn’t do them justice. Take a look at the video.

LOSER: Los Angeles Homeowners

In case you missed it, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass this week marked the one year anniversary of the devastating fires in the California Palisades by boasting that 12 houses have been rebuilt. Yes, Mayor Bass is claiming victory that 12 houses, out of the over 13,000 homes that were destroyed, have been rebuilt.

However, the mayor’s unbelievable effort at positive spin is not the worst thing about California’s inability to rebuild. In an echo of the old liberal cliché, “World ends—women and minorities suffer most,” the folks at UCLA are more concerned about whose homes are being rebuilt rather than the numbers. According to them, African-American homeowners made up a large share of the population of Altadena California, which was destroyed by the fires, and the professors at UCLA‘s Latino Policy and Politics Institute warn that those homes are likely to be the last to be rebuilt.

Since virtually nobody’s home is being rebuilt in California, you have to wonder why the folks at UCLA want to suggest that white people are cutting in line. The point is there is no line, just a brick wall of state government red tape.

Still, so far, at least black homeowners in Altadena don’t have to fear that some bureaucrat is suggesting they shouldn’t actually own a home because it is a “symbol of white supremacy, masquerading as wealth building public policy.”

Let’s pause for just a moment and give thanks that we live in a state where “wealth building public policies” are known to be a good thing.

LOSER: Beto O’Rourke Hasn’t Gone Away
Perhaps this is good news for Republicans, or maybe it doesn’t matter, but just so you know, Axios reported this week that Beto O’Rourke, who has been defeated by U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz and Gov. Greg Abbott and pretty much every Democrat who ran for president in 2020 (except Kamala Harris), is now reportedly working behind the scenes to help Texas Democrats. You may have missed the fact that he’s been campaigning in red zones like Amarillo, Wichita Falls and Tyler, and a September University of Texas/Texas Politics Project Poll showed he had higher favorability ratings among Democrats than U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas. Not seeing a ripple effect here, but will keep you posted.

WINNER: Texas Supreme Court Ends Bar Association Hegemony

In another blow against the hegemony of DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion), the Texas Supreme Court formally announced this week that the American Bar Association (ABA) will no longer determine which Texas law students can sit for the Texas bar exam. Instead, the Texas Supreme Court, whose members are elected by the people of Texas, will now develop their own criteria to approve law schools.

The ABA has long required law schools to establish strong DEI programs that are now in conflict with new Texas laws that require student admissions and faculty hiring to be based entirely on merit. And although the ABA claims to be non-partisan, it has taken official positions in support of a number of issues, including restricting fossil fuel use and limiting the death penalty. To show how out of touch they are with Texans, the ABA’s strongly opposed requiring a photo ID in order to vote—a policy that is supported by 85% of Texans, including minorities and members of both parties.

The Texas Supreme Court is the first state to make this winning move, but news reports indicate that Florida and Ohio are also poised to cut ties with the ABA.

WINNER: Eat Real Food

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s edict this week that America “Eat Real Food” has implications that go far beyond the dinner plate. One of the chief ideological tenets of the progressive left—along with the notion that there are lots of different genders and there should be no enforcement at the border—is that what you eat says a great deal about who you are.

The left would classify eating steak as a sin, if they believed in sin, so the new food pyramid—with its big picture of red meat at the top—is likely to make lefties go crazy. There’s also a left-wing war on dairy, causing us to live in a world where people actually drink something called “oat milk” and demand gluten-free communion wafers.

The rest of us, who have known since the Atkins diet in the 1980s that protein, fruits and vegetables are the key to health and carbs are the road to oblivion, were not surprised by Kennedy’s policy change, although we know it will take more than a new pyramid graphic to make it happen. The phony flavors created by food companies—like the orange stuff on Cheetos—are as addictive as cocaine and will be hard for people, especially children, to kick.

My favorite recommendation is that kids be prohibited from having added sugar until they are 10 years old, although I have no idea how they will pull it off. Currently, the recommendation is age 2, and I doubt if many parents are following that guideline.

It is disappointing that RFK, Jr., did not include a recommended daily requirement for coffee and chocolate, which we all know are two essential nutrients that make life worth living—along with steak.

WINNER: A 1951 Treaty Gives America Lots of Rights in Greenland

Secretary of State Marco Rubio is going to Denmark this week to discuss U.S. interests in Greenland. That’s a good sign that both Rubio and Danish officials read the very interesting op-ed in the New York Times this week that pointed out that the United States signed a treaty with Denmark during the Cold War which gives us broad military access to Greenland. According to Mikel Runge Olsen, of the Danish Institute for International Studies in Copenhagen, “the U.S. has such a free hand in Greenland that it can pretty much do what it wants.”

The Danish op-ed writers say the agreement allows the U.S. to construct, install, maintain, and operate” military bases across Greenland, “house personnel” and “control landings, takeoffs, anchorages, moorings, movements, and operation of ships, aircraft, and waterborne craft.”

So perhaps we can just start constructing, installing and operating and see where it goes from there. Greenlanders are pretty dug in against allowing the United States to take over at this point, but once they get to know us, I’m betting they will like us. We can barbeque a bunch of steaks, schedule a few country music concerts and win them over in a week.

WINNER: The College Football Playoffs

Despite everything that went wrong and continues to go wrong in college football, we are coming to the end of a terrific season. Last weekend, college football fans watched as the so-called “big dogs,” Ohio State, Alabama and Georgia, became “former big dogs” and last night’s semi-final game between Ole Miss and Miami was one of the best of the season, with Miami coming out on top in the last minute.

The Red Raiders, the last Texas team in the CFP fight, were defeated by Oregon last week, but Tech has stepped up with a “get ready for next year” messaging strategy this week that has been dazzling, including getting a commit from almost a dozen new players from the portal, including Brendan Sorsby.

I married into an Oregon Duck family and am a longtime fan who’ll be watching the other semi-final game tonight to see if the Quack Attack can overcome the seemingly unstoppable Indiana Hoosiers on their second try. There’s a 3.5 point spread in Indiana’s favor. The game is at 6:30 p.m. and the winner will face the University of Miami on Jan. 19.

Have a great weekend!

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Listen to Winners & Losers on Talk 1370, the Cardle & Woolley show, every Friday morning at 8:30 AM. Here’s the listen live link.

If you were forwarded this email, you can sign up to receive it every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.

Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on Apple, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

Categories
All Over the Map

All Over the Map: A Journey from Left to Right

Happy 2026! As we start the New Year, I want to share the opening of the book I am writing, “All Over the Map: A Political Journey from Left to Right.” There are more chapters to share and I will keep you updated as the year goes along. Winners & Losers regular programming will return next week.

All Over the Map: A Journey from Left to Right

Introduction

Political scientists routinely describe the current division in American politics as “tribal,” as if the seething intensity each side feels for the other is something new. I was born into a family whose political roots run deep, and I can tell you, unequivocally, that politics has always been tribal.

I grew up in an Oklahoma, still caught between its “Grapes of Wrath” complex and the “wind sweeping down the plain” images from the Broadway musical. I went door to door with my father when he was running for office, and I collected campaign brochures like baseball cards. I do not recall a time in my life that I did not know who the political allies and enemies were.

I learned West Coast politics among the tree-hugging hyper-progressive elites of Oregon and then moved east, where I watched the Democrats from the wealth belt of New Jersey push all their chips into the middle of the table to keep Bill Clinton in the presidential race. I worked for the City of New York as it buckled under the crushing weight of bankruptcy, garbage and disease, and I saw it rescued, against all odds, by a Republican named Rudy Giuliani.

I watched Donald Trump sort through his early wives and figure out his shtick in New York and I saw how sex, race and ethnicity all become political forces before identity politics reduced them to a chorus of whining grievances.

I helped the Democrat machine elect the first African-American mayor of New York City and worked on the U.S. Senate campaign of Geraldine Ferraro, the first woman to run for vice president on a major party ticket. Later, I worked for over a decade for the Lieutenant Governor of Texas, an outspoken right wing leader who serves as a symbol of the conservative movement in Texas and its spokesman in many parts of America.

I called myself a socialist Democrat, progressive and decidedly left-wing before I called myself a conservative, and arrived at the place I mostly inhabit now—the proud, bright red right wing, (though not the fringe) of the Republican Party.

One thing I have never called myself is a moderate.

Politics is a difficult habit to kick, not that I have ever really tried. Unlike Alexander Hamilton, I have often been fortunate enough to be in the room where it happened, or at least in the building where it happened or the city where it happened. That is what keeps you coming back.

In 1988, after the Democratic team was crushed in the presidential election, I asked the legendary Democrat political strategist Robert Shrum for his advice on what I should do while we waited out the four year purgatory before the next election. He told me I had to decide if I wanted to be a pundit or a player.

At that time, nobody knew more about politics than Bob Shrum, so I figured I had to pick a lane. But every time I embraced being a political player, I found myself compelled to create the punditry and policy to explain the moment. However, even after I established myself as an analyst and a pundit, I could never stay off the political playing field for long. I had to get back in the game.

Decades later, it is clear Shrum was wrong. I didn’t have to choose. I have been a political player and a pundit my entire life and have left a written trail, going from political battle to policy wars across the country. The question I get most often is how did I get from way over there on the left to way over here on the right?

“All Over the Map” is the very long answer to that question.

Oklahoma Reds and Liquor-by-the-Drink

All four of my grandparents were living proof that politics has always been tribal. They were all born in the last decade of the 19th Century: 1889, 1891, 1895 and 1896. They migrated west from Tennessee, Illinois and Arkansas, and north from Texas, and settled in the Oklahoma oilfields at the turn of the century. They settled in a place called Oilton, three miles from the banks of the Cimarron River, and just west of the line that separated Indian Territory from Oklahoma Territory.

My father’s grandfather fought for the Union in the Civil War, and my other three grandparents were grandchildren of Confederate soldiers. But the Civil War did not drive the everyday narrative of any of them, even though they were all born about 30 years after Appomattox and must have grown up hearing about the war that their families had lived through.

Instead, they were part of what some call the “recovery generation,” after the Civil War. About 20% of all children were gainfully employed by the age of 10 at the time, and the stories my grandparents told all stemmed from hard times and survival—which had shaped their world view and defined their politics.

Their thought leader was Will Rogers, the legendary Oklahoma-born humourist and political commentator and, like him, they believed Oklahoma was the heart of the country. They thought the red clay of the Cimarron River was the lifeblood of the nation, kind of an Okie Nile. I was baptized in that river.

My grandmother told me that her father had been part of the socialist movement known as the Oklahoma Reds that grew out of the dustbowl. The Working Class Union (WCU) in Oklahoma elected almost 200 people to the state legislature between 1915 and 1917, and their gubernatorial candidate got 30% of the vote in 1916. They were anti-capitalist isolationists, driven left by the exploitation of farmers by Northeastern banks. It’s not clear whether my great grandfather was a Socialist or a Communist, but whichever it was, my grandmother did not share his views.

Late in her life she told me, “My father was always going to Socialist meetings and talking about what was said. He had Socialist magazines and newspapers all over the house. I read them all and I didn’t believe a word of it. So in 1918, when women got the right to vote in Oklahoma, I went right down and registered Republican.”

She voted Republican her entire life, much to the consternation of my father who thought her political choice reflected her ignorance. The Democrat Party was the party of working people. Oklahoma was a Democrat state and had been since the beginning. To vote Republican meant you were opting out of most elections, since the victor of the primary was always the ultimate winner. The only other Republicans anybody knew about were African-Americans.

Her husband, my grandfather, was also a Republican for family reasons. He told me that because his father had fought for the Union, in “Lincoln’s Army,” he voted Republican in his honor.

In my mother’s family, politics was driven by cultural issues. My mother’s father had been a bootlegger during Prohibition, and our family albums include several arrest and conviction clippings. He mostly shifted away from criminal activity after Prohibition ended, but stayed in the beer joint and night club business, sponsoring the occasional floating poker game on the down-low.

My grandfather’s bar had a big picture of Will Rogers on the wall, the same Will Rogers who said he “didn’t belong to an organized political party; he was a Democrat.” I can never remember not knowing that joke.

Rogers is most famous for saying is that he never met a man he didn’t like, but his political commentary was all based on “us”—the Everymen of Oklahoma and America and “them” —the rich, the elites in the Northeast and the ridiculous people in Hollywood. He made fun of both sides, but it was tribal.

In my first trip to Washington, D.C. after college, my family made sure I found the statue of Will Rogers in the Capitol—Oklahoma’s contribution to Statuary Hall. It’s in a prime spot outside the U.S. House Chamber, and television crews today call it the “Will Rogers stakeout” because they can ambush lawmakers there and force interviews.

The big picture of Will Rogers in my grandfather’s pool hall may have provided him with the inspiration to keep battling to legalize liquor-by-the-drink in Oklahoma. It was legal to buy a glass of beer (nobody drank wine), but a bar could not dispense hard liquor.

Most bars, including my grandfather’s, got around the law by declaring they were private clubs and handing out membership cards to customers to display if the police showed up. The liquor bottles all had people’s names written on them—to prove that the members had brought them in and the bar was just serving them. This charade went on in honky tonks and fancy hotels. It was the Oklahoma way.

Liquor-by-the-drink was on the ballot every election year when I was growing up. My grandmother always had a Legalize Liquor by the Drink bumper sticker on whatever big Oldsmobile she was driving.

I asked my father once about life during the Depression, and he told me that 1933 was the worst year. There was no money, and he and his father had worked for food because everyone was trading by a barter system. But he added, “Of course, your grandfather had money.” Apparently, the bar business was always good.

My bar-owning grandparents were “yellow dog,” straight-ticket Democrat voters, but it didn’t help them. They died in the early 1980s before liquor-by-the-drink became legal in Oklahoma.

All Politics Really are Local

All four of my grandparents made it very clear to me that politics mattered and understanding it was important, but it was my father who showed me what living a political life meant. He ran for city council when I was in elementary school, and later was elected mayor when I was in high school. He was always in contested elections, often engaged in the very bitter battles that define small town politics. I grew up campaigning.

Although my father had strong political views, he was a reluctant politician. Going hungry during the Depression haunted him throughout his life. So did his time fighting in four theaters of war during World War II. He remained angry that President Franklin Roosevelt had promised that “no American son would have to fight in more than two theaters of war,” but he’d been shipped into four.

He didn’t think he’d make it back, but he did and returned to the oilfield job he got when he graduated from high school. While he was still, in his 20s, he was urged to run for city council. He seemed to exemplify the greatest generation before they knew they how great they were.

After a few terms on city council, he was elected mayor—a job which famously paid one dollar a year—and pushed forward an expansive agenda for our town starting with buying the water company, a move that meant that anytime someone had low water pressure, they called our house to complain.

The track survey for our little town was wonky, so he walked every block and assigned each house its proper number. Then he got the Boy Scouts to sell everybody new house numbers.

My parents supported President Lyndon Baines Johnson, and after he launched the War on Poverty my father got a call from a guy in the newly established office of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) who wanted to meet with him and get a tour of our little town. My dad was very excited about this because he had some ideas about building some housing for old people and young families who really needed it.

His real job was in the oil fields, so on the day of the meeting, he had to take off work and change his clothes before he could meet the HUD man. He made it back to our house just in time for dinner.

When my Mom asked him how it went, he laughed and said that the man from HUD had condemned the entire town, pronouncing every house (including ours) as substandard. He wanted to tear them all down and build new ones.

My mother was wild eyed with disbelief. Our house had been given to us by my grandfather, and my Dad had fixed it up. We lived next door to the house where my mother was born. She told my father unequivocally they he could not let them tear down our house.

My Dad assured her that wouldn’t happen, dismissing the HUD men and his colleagues as “crazy bureaucrats.” It was the first time I ever heard that term, but it ultimately helped me understand the entire War on Poverty.

The HUD man never returned and no houses were torn down. A couple years later, I was home from college for the weekend and my father asked me to help him fill out a HUD grant application to build the low-income rental housing he’d envisioned. The town was awarded the grant and built 20 units across from the baseball field. They are still there.

I don’t think our neighbors ever had any idea what he’d saved them from.

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Listen to Winners & Losers on Talk 1370, the Cardle & Woolley show, every Friday morning at 8:30 AM. Here’s the listen live link.

If you were forwarded this email, you can sign up to receive it every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.

Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on Apple, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

Categories
Winners & Losers

Winners & Losers: The Sermon on the “Mound” & Religious Illiteracy

After a year of debating and finally passing a new curriculum for Texas public schools, it seems like the day after Christmas is a good time to re-visit this piece I wrote in 2024 about cultural illiteracy and the importance of understanding the role Christianity plays in the foundation of our western culture.

“Sermon on the Mound,” Shows Religious Illiteracy
August 15, 2024

One could only laugh at the news report by CBS 5 in Austin that cited “concern over a ‘Bible infused public school curriculum in Texas.’” According to the reporter, one of those “concerns” is that students would be taught about the “Sermon on the Mound.” Here’s what she wrote:

But criticism sparked when the teaching materials released, included biblical principles like the “Sermon on the Mound,” the life of Jesus Christ from birth to resurrection, and Bible prophecies.

Yep. Sermon on the Mound. Insert your own baseball joke here.

The obvious reference to the “Sermon on the Mount” could have been a typo—but if so, not only did the reporter miss it, the proofreaders also missed it. It was posted for almost a day before being corrected.

Did they miss it because they don’t know that the Sermon on the Mount is widely considered to be the most famous sermon ever delivered? If they didn’t know that, then they should understand that is precisely the reason the new public school curriculum they are “concerned” about is necessary.

To give the Sermon on the Mount an historical, non-religious cohort, it was the “I Have a Dream” speech of its time. Of course, Martin Luther King Jr. never would have written the “I have a Dream” speech if not for the Sermon on the Mount, because there never would have been a civil rights movement, or emancipation from slavery. In fact, there would never have been an America, at least as we know it today, and Martin Luther King Jr. would not have been named Martin Luther.

The basis for “all men are created equal” is rooted in “blessed are the poor in heart, blessed are the meek, blessed are the merciful”—all from the Sermon on the Mount.

Religious illiteracy is not rare in America. Years ago, while working in a newsroom, I was asked to coach a junior reporter on a piece she was doing for Christmas. She wrote, “Like the old saying goes, it is better to give than to receive.”

I informed her it was not an “old saying,” that, in fact, Christ had said it. The reporter had no idea, apparently having never made a link between Christ and Christmas.

Like all illiteracy, cluelessness about the Bible reflects a lack of basic cultural knowledge akin to not knowing what the Declaration of Independence is and how it is related to the Magna Carta, and how the Magna Carta is related to the Sermon on the Mount.

The Sermon on the Mount is one of the primary building blocks of Western Civilization—changing our values from hierarchy, entitlement and barbarism to humility, forgiveness, and caring for others.

When the leadership at the Texas Education Agency followed the direction of the Texas Legislature with the passage of House Bill 1605, the goal wasn’t to convert students to Christianity in the classroom. Instead, the goal is to ensure that Texas students understand the values and principles that resulted in the exploration and settlement of North America, the founding of our country and the systems and laws that guide our country today.

It’s not just a story for Christians. Educated Jewish and Muslim Americans know the story of the Sermon on the Mount and how it fits into the American story—they also know how its history is related to the stories of their faith.

Teaching isn’t preaching, even if some of the stories come from a historical source like the Bible. Using another Bible story example, the Good Samaritan can help teach children how to be good neighbors to all. Discussing the Golden Rule and its origin reinforces the civilized way to treat one another. Going back to Martin Luther King Jr. again, he used the Bible to make the case for moral law in his famous Letter from Birmingham Jail, a document that every Texas student is required to read and learn about.

A majority of Texans support adding the Bible to the historical sources used in the classroom. According to a new poll conducted by WPAi for TPPF, 64% of Texans support the inclusion of historical religious stories and examples into state provided curriculum, while only 33% are opposed. Further, 58% say the biblical stories provide students with a greater understanding of the development of Western civilization, versus just 25% who say it has the potential for religious indoctrination.

Of course, biblical illiteracy is not the only problem that has come up in the debate over Texas’ new public school curriculum. In the CBS 5 news report, a distinguished political science professor from Rice University snidely insisted that the curriculum probably violates the “separation clause” of the Constitution.

There is, of course, no “separation clause” in the Constitution. What the Constitution bans is an official, government supported church. Literate Texas students should know that too.

The reporter who wrote “Sermon on the Mound” in a news report demonstrates precisely why a curriculum for Texas public schools should include all the historical resources, including the Bible, that contribute to our country’s identity. It is one of the things needed to understand what it means to be an American. It’s all connected. It’s impossible to understand the importance of Juneteenth, for example, without understanding the significance of the message of the Sermon on the Mount—that’s Mount, not Mound.

May your Christmas season continue to be merry and bright.

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Listen to Winners & Losers on Talk 1370, the Cardle & Woolley show, every Friday morning at 8:30 AM. Here’s the listen live link.

If you were forwarded this email, you can sign up to receive it every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.

Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on Apple, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

Categories
Winners & Losers

Winners & Losers: Best of 2025

Throughout 2025, I joined the Cardle & Woolley Show every Friday morning on Talk 1370 Radio in Austin to announce the week’s Winners & Losers. Starting with the inauguration of President Donald Trump’s second term and an epic session of the Texas Legislature, 2025 has been an epic year, changing the course of history in so many ways, for good and for ill. To reflect a bit, I pulled the best and the worst happenings from this year’s Winners & Losers lists:  

WINNER: The Best of 2025—Trump Should Get the Nobel Peace Prize

June 27 — American presidents have been trying to rein in the theocracy in Iran for the last 40 years, using all kinds of threats, sanctions, sticks and carrots in an effort to get the Iranians to stop developing a nuclear weapon. President Trump finally said, “Times up,” when it was clear Iran had no intention of backing down. In a massive display of American might—those B-2 bombers had never been in battle before—he blasted their program out of existence, ensuring that the largest state sponsor of terrorism no longer has the ability to develop a nuclear bomb.

He did so while expressing no malice toward Iran—urging Iranians to focus on trade and building their economy instead of their jihad against Jews. At the same time, he was unequivocal that the United States will never abandon our commitment to Israel.

Trump’s F-Bomb statement—that Iran and Israel had been fighting so hard for so long that they don’t know what the f*** they are doing”—not only succinctly describes how most of the world views the Middle East, it also made it crystal clear that he had no intention of joining that fight.

Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice called Trump’s action “a shot in the arm for American credibility.” Rice served under George W. Bush, one of Trump’s harshest critics. The shift Rice saw in American credibility was immediately apparent in the NATO Summit that week, where every country in Europe except Spain finally agreed to substantially increase what they pay for their defense, no longer forcing the U.S. to cover most of the costs. This was a goal Trump set during his first term, but no one believed he had any hope of succeeding. Now he has.  

What happened to Iran sends a strong message to Russia and China about America’s strength and the principles that make up the Trump doctrine. “Kill all the Jews” can’t be anyone’s national mission statement, but his simple pleas to Iranian leaders to open some markets, make some money and “give peace a chance” has a whole new meaning in our current times.

Granted, the ceasefire may not hold, and Trump’s additional effort to end the fighting in Gaza may not be successful, but no world leader has pushed for world peace harder than Trump—in the Middle East, in Ukraine, in Asia. His name has repeatedly been floated for the Nobel Peace Prize. Whether he receives it has nothing to do with merit, of course, like getting all A’s at Harvard.

President Barack Obama received the Peace Prize in 2009, but it’s not exactly clear why. According to the Nobel Committee’s press release, Obama wanted to turn over international negotiations to the United Nations and embrace the fight against climate change—plus he was a big star who gave people hope. Trump’s record in just the last few months outshines that, but as I said, peace prizes aren’t awarded on merit.

LOSER: The Worst Event of 2025–Losing Charlie Kirk

September 12 — So much has been said and will continue to be said about the amazing Charlie Kirk: He was a brilliant thinker, inspired leader, husband, father, man of faith who changed the political landscape in America. I met Charlie after hearing him speak at a large conservative event a number of years ago—I don’t remember which one.

I didn’t take him seriously at the time, after he stated his mission was to win over younger voters. I have been in and around politics for decades, and every election cycle or two somebody rises up and professes they will win the next election by getting out the youth vote. It had never worked before.

Charlie Kirk changed that, wading onto college campuses across the country, and talking to students about everything from Marxism to immigration to Native American health care to sex before marriage—whatever they wanted to debate with him. He believed that in order to save the greatest country in the world, it’s critical to talk with people who disagree with you. He said:

“…when people stop talking, really bad stuff starts. When marriages stop talking, divorce happens. When civilizations stop talking, civil war ensues. When you stop having a human connection with someone you disagree with, it becomes a lot easier to want to commit violence against that group. . . . What we as a culture have to get back to is being able to have a reasonable disagreement, where violence is not an option.”

Charlie was an evangelical Christian who recently told the Catholic News Service that if he died, he wanted to be remembered for acting with the courage of his faith. This moved me to go back and re-listen to his appearance on comedian Bill Maher’s podcast “Club Random,” earlier this year.

Maher is the most prominent and outspoken atheist of our time. He not only doesn’t believe in God, he believes religion is a malevolent force in our culture. The title of his documentary film, “Religulous” combines the words religion and ridiculous, and it’s meant to expose what he sees as the absurdity of faith.

But like Charlie, Maher believes dialogue and disagreement are critical. “Everybody is a monster until you talk with them,” Maher says.

Charlie sat down with him in April. You can listen to their conversation here. In the opening minutes, Maher casually comments on the security people Charlie brought with him, asking “do you need security?” Knowing what we know now, the exchange is chilling.

Wall Street Journal columnist Kim Strassel notes that what usually happens in America after heart-breaking political violence like this is the country is on good behavior for a week or so before politicians on both sides go back to stoking up their supporters, insisting that their political opponents will bring tyranny and an end to civilization as we know it. The suspect in the murder apparently believed killing Charlie was fighting fascism. Ironically, when a student once accused Charlie of being a fascist to his face, Charlie asked him to “name one fascist thing about me.” The student not only didn’t know what Charlie stood for, he also didn’t really know what fascism was.

Charlie believed talking to people who disagree with you is the only path to real change. He bet his life on it.

WINNER: Gender is Over, Sex is Back

January 25 — Trump’s Executive Order, “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,” officially ended the battle for “biological truth” that has been going on for almost a decade. Skirmishes continue all over the country, but in fact, this one is done.

Later in the year, in a 6 to 3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the right of Tennessee to bar parents from giving their children puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones and allowing them to undergo unneeded mastectomies and even castrations in an effort to change their sex. Hopefully, this will bring the destructive mutilation called “gender affirming care” to an end.

LOSER: Biden Cover-Up Still on Big Loser List

May 20 — After Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson’s book, “Original Sin,” made a big splash, I assumed the issue of former President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline in office would finally rotate off Winners and Losers. Surely, that horse has been sufficiently beaten. But then the tapes of Biden’s deposition by Special Counsel Robert Hur were released and America could actually hear just how disoriented the former president was. His sense of time, his focus, his grasp on reality—all demonstrated that Hur had been right when he said that although Biden had broken the law regarding classified documents, he was so feeble and forgetful that no jury would convict him.

The Hur tapes further validated the information in Tapper’s book about how the White House staff misled the public about Biden’s competence. The Joe Biden revealed on those tapes was the same Joe Biden who his advisors said was sharp as a tack.

Finally, it wasn’t just conservatives who were asking, “Who was running the country?”

Then, just before that question could be seriously considered, Biden’s spokespeople announced that the former president has “Stage 4 prostate cancer that has metastasized to his bones.”

That is terrible news for the former president and his family and virtually everyone, including President Trump and Biden’s harshest critics in conservative media, have profusely and repeatedly expressed their concerns and offered their prayers.

Unfortunately for the Biden family, after the Tapper book and the Hur tapes, they are no longer trusted by anyone, so this awful news doesn’t just evoke sympathy, it raises more questions: Men his age are routinely screened for prostate cancer. If Biden wasn’t, why not?

Biden said he had cancer in 2022, but his staff said he misspoke. Did he? Did the family know Biden had cancer and not tell the country? Did Biden know he had cancer when he was insisting that he would run for re-election again? Did Jill Biden and Hunter know? Did his advisors, the so-called “Politburo” who were apparently making all the presidential decisions, know? Or was Biden somehow unlucky enough to have a personal physician who missed a crucial point on the former president’s regular check-up? Texas Sen. John Cornyn has asked DOJ to investigate “potential violations of federal law regarding representations made to the general public about the president’s health.

Going forward, historians will undoubtedly debate whether the Biden cover-up was just a sequence of bad decisions made expediently, or if voters had unknowingly put a Richard III in the Oval Office where he and his advisors would do whatever it took to keep the White House.

In the short term, a good question for the media to ponder is how did the former president so completely destroy the public’s trust that even a tragic cancer diagnosis raises justified suspicion?

WINNER: Taxpayers No Longer Must Fund NPR and PBS

July 18 — Not sure why this was even debatable, but last summer, President Donald Trump actually had to waste his valuable time convincing some Republican senators to move forward with clawing back federal funding from National Public Radio and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting as part of his rescissions package.

“Clawing back” is the appropriate term. Conservatives have been fighting tooth and nail to end taxpayer funding of the left-wing public media outlets for decades. NPR and PBS have always been among the most biased news sources, because they don’t even have market forces to keep them even-handed. In recent history, they pushed the Russia-gate story, censored anyone who suggested COVID-19 might have come from a lab leak, and refused to cover Hunter Biden’s laptop, according to an insider report, because editors were worried the story “might help Trump” win the election.

The government should not be funding media—left, right or whatever. That’s a communist thing. I usually am not a fan of U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Georgia, but her congressional hearing comments to the leaders of PBS and NPR summed it up perfectly: “We believe that you all can hate us on your own dime.”

LOSER: No Kings March Proves There Are No Kings

June 19 — A fake tweet was posted by somebody suggesting that Trump thanked all the No Kings protestors for making sure that no king took his place. He happily reported he is still the president.

Too bad it was fake, because, as a USA Today column pointed out, the nationwide marches prove the point that democracy is alive and well in America. We don’t know how much the American Federation of Teachers spent to help promote the No Kings events, but they didn’t get much for their money. We got one more round of the usual low-grade street riots in Los Angeles, Seattle and New York, but it was mostly a big nothing burger. Meanwhile, the president’s parade in Washington, D.C., celebrating the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, went off without a hitch. It got great reviews, even from critics at left-wing MSNBC who were shocked that there was no “dark, malevolent energy.”

LOSER: Democrats and the Shutdown War

November 14 — It was great seeing the headline in the Washington Post proclaiming the Democrats had lost the shutdown battle after that newspaper spent 40 days proclaiming that the blue team was winning. Granted, the liberals at the WaPo predict that Republicans will ultimately lose on the health care issue, and maybe they will, but, in fact, nobody ever really understood what the Democrats were trying to prove.  

After almost six weeks of shutdown, at a cost estimate of anywhere between $7 billion and $15 billion a week, eight Democrat senators listened to the demands of the American people to bring the shutdown to an end and broke the logjam. The majority of Democrat lawmakers are outraged at the defection of the eight and, as they try to regroup, most seem to think all their problems will be solved if they get rid of their minority leader, U.S. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-New York, who couldn’t hold his caucus together and refused to endorse New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani.

They have no idea why they lost.  

LOSERS: Faculty Councils at Texas Universities

September 5 — Several of Texas’ flagship universities announced this week that they are taking steps to disband faculty senates and councils that have insisted for years that they, not college presidents or boards of regents, are in charge of our taxpayer-funded universities.

Senate Bill 37, authored by Sen. Brandon Creighton, R-Conroe and Rep. Matt Shaheen, R-Plano, stops all that and returns control of the campus and the curriculum to the Boards of Regents, appointed by Gov. Greg Abbott, who is elected by the people of Texas.

At the University of Texas at Austin and the University of North Texas, there are four liberals for every conservative—numbers which create a culture more hospitable to progressive and DEI-infused ideology than the values of free speech and open inquiry. When it comes to reforming higher education, Texas has created the model that President Trump and the rest of the country are following. Dynamic new leadership at the state’s flagship universities is making an enormous difference. Ending the hegemony of so-called “faculty governance” groups is one big key to change.

WINNER: A Great Year of College Football in Texas

Despite the continued threats to college football from the machinations of NIL and the struggle between those who want to save intercollegiate competition and those who want to create an NFL feeder league, 2025 was a great year in college football with three Texas flagships ending up in the Top 15.

The No. 4-ranked Red Raiders of Texas Tech are the Big 12 Champions! They will play the winner of the Oregon vs. James Madison University game in the Orange Bowl on New Year’s Day. No. 7-ranked Texas A&M had an undefeated season, until the last game when the University of Texas knocked them out of the SEC championship battle, with a 27 to 17 victory. The Aggies are still in the CFP, of course, and will play Miami tomorrow night in the first round.

The Texas Longhorns, ranked No. 14, will play Michigan in the Citrus Bowl on New Year’s Eve. Please continue to cheer on Savings College Sports in 2026. GameDay’s Pat McAfee and Texas Tech Board of Regents Chair Cody Campbell lay it all out here.

Meanwhile, Gig ‘em, Wreck ‘em, Hook ‘em.

Have a blessed Christmas.

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Sign up to receive this in your inbox every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.

Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on AppleSpotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

Categories
Winners & Losers

Winners & Losers: Watching the Data & the History

Every Friday morning, I join the Cardle & Woolley Show on Talk 1370 Radio in Austin to announce the week’s Winners & Losers. Amid the joys of this holy season and the machinations of the College Football Playoff bracket, here’s the list for this week:

WINNER: Paying Attention to History

White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles announced this week that President Donald Trump is going to be out campaigning like it was 2024. The president is also taking steps to regain the ground he has lost over the past few months. While you won’t hear it on Fox News, the president’s polling numbers are definitely down and any conservative pundit who tries to explain it away simply isn’t paying attention.

Conservatives often dismiss polling data because we are right on the issues and the Democrats and progressives are so very wrong, but being right isn’t always enough. We are in a fight of light over darkness—and to win, we cannot forget that.

In August, I voiced concerns about those who were saying that the progressive Democrat Party had been destroyed and conservatives would dominate for the next decade—even millennia. I wish that were true, but history tells us it isn’t. Here’s the snippet I wrote this summer that bears repeating today:

Unfortunately, the persistent cluelessness of Democrats has caused too many conservatives to prematurely pronounce them dead and even on the verge of extinction. But political terrain in America shifts quickly, and Democrats have been here before.

In 1972, Republicans defeated left-winger George McGovern in the biggest Republican landslide in history, but just four years later, a guy nobody had ever heard of, Georgia Gov. Jimmy Carter, took the White House back for the Democrats. It was a sweet victory for the blue team, but then Ronald Reagan took Carter out after just one term and in 1988, when Reagan ran for re-election, he won 49 states.

Times were as bad for Democrats back then as they are now. They didn’t really have a leader. All their big guns stood down. Former New York Gov. Mario Cuomo (father of losing NYC mayoral candidate Andrew) was viewed as the Democrats’ strongest candidate, but he was afraid to run against George H.W. Bush.

However, there was this governor from the poor and tiny state of Arkansas whose only claim to fame was a disastrous speech delivered at the Democratic National Convention (his only applause line was “in conclusion”), who thought he could beat Bush. Clinton threw his hat in the ring and we know what happened from there.

It is dangerous to forget history.

Democrats may seem clueless right now, but they are not dead. Politics turns on a dime. Conservatives should remember 1972, 1976, 1992, and 2008. If we don’t pay attention, the Democrats will make the country pay some other way.

Just saying. Meanwhile, look who else made the Winners List this week:

WINNER: Jasmine Crockett Eight Points Up

I was wrong last week when I predicted that U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas, would ultimately balk on a U.S. Senate run. She announced on Monday that she is definitely in, and the first public poll released this week conducted by Texas Southern University shows her up eight points over state Rep. James Talarico, D-Round Rock. Meanwhile, Colin Allred, who ran against Sen. Ted Cruz last time, and had been the frontrunner in the Democrat Senate primary race for a while, dropped out in the face of a Crockett candidacy.

According to the poll, African Americans are solidly behind Crockett, while Hispanics and Anglos are with Talarico. It is a long time until next March’s primary and even longer until the November election—where it is unlikely either one of them can defeat whomever the Republicans choose to run for the seat. But for now, the always hateful and frequently foul-mouthed Crockett is the face of the Democrat party in Texas—and that is a good thing for conservatives. Let’s hope she launches a speaking tour all over the state making fun of Gov. Greg Abbott for being in a wheel chair and talking about the need for open borders to bring more workers so black people won’t have to pick cotton.

WINNER: Amnesty International Finally Reports Hamas Oct. 7 Crimes

Amnesty International leans heavily left, but this week it finally reported that the Oct. 7, 2023 attack by Hamas on Israel targeted civilians and killed over a thousand people. Amnesty International also confirmed that the hundreds who were captured by Hamas were subjected to physical torture and sexual assault and violence.

This is certainly not news, but it is important since there are so many young Americans on college campuses who continue to believe that the attack didn’t happen, or if it did, it was somehow justified. The Amnesty International report echoes similar findings by the United Nations, making it harder for left-wingers in America to ignore.

LOSER: President Trump Moves to Legalize Pot

It probably should be no surprise that President Trump is said to be moving toward taking steps to legalize marijuana. He’s got his hand on the pulse of the country and 64% of Americans support legalizing pot (although that’s down from 70% in 2023).

As a boomer who lived through the golden age of marijuana—back when it was mild and cheap—it is hard to see how this is a good idea. The links to marijuana psychosis are terrifying, and too often link to mass shooters. Plus, in a time where so many young people are already wandering in the wilderness, why would we want to take steps to expand the use of a drug that reduces ambition and focus, and increases aimlessness?

There are many heroes who have been fighting for years against legalizing pot in Texas including Dr. Matt Poling, from College Station. Take a look at what he says here.

LOSER: Indigenous Peoples Scam

It looks like a Small Business Administration program designed to help “small disadvantaged businesses” is actually a scam that has resulted in billions in fraud and bribes to native tribes and other “disadvantaged groups” that partner with non-natives to do business. This report in Tribal Business News on the recent Senate hearing provides the long time line and scope of the scam. Here’s a telling quote from the Daily Wire report on the hearing:

“…there are skyscrapers down the street in Tyson’s Corner, [Virginia] defense contractors working on advanced weapons that don’t have to bid competitively for contracts because we say they’re Alaskan Native corporations. Every one of us in this room knows there are not Native Alaskans in those buildings … The scandal isn’t that there have been a few examples of abuse. The scandal is that it’s hard to find one that isn’t.” 

LOSER: Mid-Cycle Redistricting Map Wars

At this point it looks like the Trump strategy to increase GOP numbers in the U.S. House before next year’s mid-term elections appears to have fizzled after the state senate in Indiana voted against a proposed redistricting map last night. Even though Texas’ map was upheld in court last week, California’s map will likely also be upheld—making those five seats a wash for Democrats and Republicans. Looking at the current tally, Republicans could come out one seat ahead when all the smoke clears. That seems like a lot of squeezing for very little juice.

WINNER: Texas Economy Remains Strong

In some final data, this week’s reports show Texas sales tax receipts are up 5.4% over last year, the Texas oil and gas industry paid $27 billion in state taxes and royalties in 2025 and the Texas Workforce Commission reported the state has added 168,000 jobs this year. Winding down 2025 in the Lone Star State, that’s a lot of merry and bright.

Have a great weekend.

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Sign up to receive this in your inbox every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.

Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on AppleSpotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

Categories
Winners & Losers

Winners & Losers: Big Map Wins & Other Victories

Every Friday morning, I join the Cardle & Woolley Show on Talk 1370 Radio in Austin to announce the week’s Winners & Losers. Not sure why there are so many more winners than losers this week, but here’s who made the list.

WINNER: Texas Congressional District Map Stands

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled yesterday that the Texas new congressional map can stay in place for next year’s election. My favorite line from the ruling is the conservative majorities’ assertion that the “lower court had failed to presume legislative good faith.” I think many people have forgotten that there is any such thing as “legislative good faith”—so great to see it affirmed.

The Supremes also charged that opponents of the map had presented circumstantial evidence and that it was too close to the election (the filing deadline is on Monday). The high court said, “the District Court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, causing much confusion and upsetting the delicate federal-state balance in elections.”

Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch wrote that it was clear that Texas lawmakers had drawn lines based on partisanship—whether voters were likely Democrats or Republicans—not race, which made the map legal. This is a big win for Texas Republicans. It will add five new Texas house seats and energize Republicans across the state who have been engaged in congressional campaigns for months.

California’s new map that adds five new Democrat-leaning House seats will have to meet the same challenge, proving partisanship, not racial gerrymandering. Odds seem good that will happen, but you never know.

WINNER: Trump Ends Biden’s Green Fuel Mandates

In a great move for Texas and the world this week, President Donald Trump announced that he is ending Joe Biden’s fuel economy and emission regulations for new cars and light trucks. Biden had pronounced that they’d all have to get 50.1 miles to the gallon by 2031. Trump rolled that back to 34.5.

This move will likely make cars cheaper—we saw just last week in California that they have decided that electric vehicles are not really financially feasible. Biden’s regulations have been costing both jobs and money, while Trump has always seen that policies that hamstring fossil fuels have crippling side effects that sap our economic strength and even our national security. And, as we know in Texas, fossil fuels are critical when it comes to reliability.

WINNER: Trump Pardons U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar

President Donald Trump issued a “full and unconditional pardon” this week of Laredo Congressman Henry Cuellar. Cuellar, a Democrat, was the first Texas Secretary of State to serve under former Gov. Rick Perry, who appointed him in 2001. He was first elected to Congress in 2005—so he’s been there 20 years.

Trump stated that the feds went after Cuellar when he broke with his party regarding their open border policies, instead supporting what Trump had done to close the border. Nobody doubts Cuellar when he said the people in his district he agreed with him. Cuellar is one of the few remaining moderate Democrats, and says he intends to run for re-election next year.

WINNER: Creighton Takes Charge at Texas Tech

Brandon Creighton, the new Chancellor at Texas Tech, is not the first Texas conservative to call out the ideological indoctrination that has contaminated the culture on most university campuses, including in Texas, but, working alongside Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, he is the first person to take steps to eradicate it.

Creighton wrote legislation that empowers regents to review the curriculum. And this week, he provided the guidelines for that process. For starters, no one will be taught that there are more than two genders.

Next, no one will be taught that one race is inherently superior to another. Do they do that? Absolutely. Theories of “white supremacy,” and “colonization” appear in dozens of courses, teaching that students of one race are guilty of crimes and other races are not.

The same is true of the notion that an “individual, by virtue of race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, consciously or unconsciously.” Does that happen? You bet it does. Ever hear anyone say, “Check your white privilege at the door”? That’s why prohibiting the teaching that moral character is determined by race and that individuals bear responsibility or guilt for actions of others of the same race.

Creighton’s memo also said no person can be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment because of race or sex. Isn’t that already illegal? Yes, but just last year Texas A&M had to end its involvement in a higher ed program that did not allow white or Asian students to apply.

Finally, Creighton’s directive notes that students cannot be taught that “meritocracy or a strong work ethic are racist, sexist, or constructs of oppression.” If you are thinking, who thought they were, the answer is basically every DEI professor and text book writer in the country. Michael Sandel, at Harvard, wrote a book called “The Tyranny of Merit.” DEI programs have identified an “emphasis on hard work” as racist, as well as time schedules and punctuality requirements.

Creighton has been fearless in tackling this massive ideological misinformation campaign, and his latest move is one more step in returning our universities to places of open inquiry and freedom of thought.

WINNER: Trump Puts Media on the Record

I concluded a while ago that fighting media bias is tilting at windmills. Even when you catch the media red-handed, they never confess, they never apologize, they never correct and, most importantly, they never change.

Just this week, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant slammed down New York Times’ writer Andrew Ross Sorkin, who questioned him about a New York Times report that Trump was slowing down—working shorter hours, holding fewer meetings. Hours after the New York Times story was released, the White House provided logs showing that Trump routinely works 12 hour days, in addition to outside political activities.

Bessant pointed out that the New York Times was deeply involved in the repeated failure to report Joe Biden’s cognitive decline—which he called “one of the greatest scandals of our times.”

It was fun to watch Bessant take down Sorkin, but it is unlikely to make any difference. Still, the Trump White House website, Misleading.Bias.Exposed, is a good counter to the avalanche of biased news coverage.

Speaking of, it’s time for Politifact’s annual “Lie of the Year” contest where they allow their readers to vote on what they deem to be the biggest untruths of the last 12 months. This year voters can choose from six alleged “lies” by President Trump, five alleged lies by other conservatives, versus one alleged lie each from J.B. Pritzger and Hakeem Jeffries—along with internet story that Trump was dead.

LOSER: Jasmine Crockett’s Potential Senate Run?

poll from the left-leaning Change Research reported this week that half of Democrats say they definitely would not vote for U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas, who is suggesting that she will announce on Monday that she is running for the U.S. Senate seat currently held by Sen. John Cornyn.

Crockett, who represents a big chunk of Dallas in Congress, gained notoriety after referring to Gov. Greg Abbott as “Governor Hot Wheels,” and explaining that she supports open borders because black people are done picking cotton—meaning that illegal immigrants are needed to work in America’s fields.

Crockett has the highest name ID of any Democrat in the poll, but 40 percent of Democrats view her negatively, which can give us all some hope that Texas Democrats aren’t totally clueless. Crockett said this week that she is “closer to yes than to no” when it comes to running for the statewide job, and told reporters today said she was calling others who are already in the race.

It would be absolutely terrific for conservatives if Crockett was at the top of the Democrat ticket in Texas running for the U.S. Senate—she is a gift that keeps on giving. Every time she opens her mouth, she demonstrates the combination of irrationality and hatefulness that has become the progressive Democrat brand. Still, I will not be surprised if she ultimately walks away. Even if she wins the Democrat nomination she is unlikely to win the seat. Even this lefty poll shows Democrats 10 points behind. I think it’s a stunt by Crockett to get attention—but I would love to be wrong.

WINNER: San Antonio Spur Victor Wembanyama Makes Forbes ‘30 Under 30’

It is a victory for all of Texas that the 7’4” San Antonio Spur Victor Wembanyama has been named to the Forbes “30 Under 30” list in the sports category, not just because he was “Rookie of the Year” and then NBA defensive player of the year, but because of everything else he is doing to expand the basketball fan base. The Spurs don’t win as much as they used to, but Wemby feels like the championship Spurs used to feel—international, innovative and dedicated to the community. Whenever Wemby is playing, the game gets better—and now more people will be watching.

WINNER: Tech Plays for Big 12 Title

Texas Tech Red Raiders will take on BYU tomorrow in Arlington for the Big 12 Championship. Tech beat BYU last month in Lubbock in what some viewed as an upset, and the Raiders are the favorite to win tomorrow—but it won’t be easy. BYU will be looking for revenge. GUNS UP!

Have a great weekend.

Categories
9th & Congress

9th & Congress: Parents’ Bill of Rights Ends They/Them Fight

An enterprising reporter at the New York Post never believed the FBI when it said that Thomas Crooks, the 20-year-old young man who shot President Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, didn’t have a social media footprint. She kept digging and found that Crooks was hanging out in some dark corners of the Internet and had a very weird and sometimes awful presence online.

Among other things, Crooks described himself using they/them, as gender-confused people sometimes do. His social media postings feature transgender flags, colors and themes, although it’s not clear how he viewed himself.

He posted photos of himself shooting guns and was included in chats with so-called “furries.” He also downloaded lots of photos of very muscular women.

It is clear Crooks was disconnected and deeply troubled, which raises questions about how he was treated in school. Did his teachers call him they/them and if so, do they think it helped him?

It is an important question because recently, the Texas Tribune reported that some Texas teachers believe that the worst thing you can do to a child is call him “him” or her “her” if he or she says they are a they/them.

These teachers also say it is even worse if teachers call a child by the actual name they were given at birth but which they no longer use because they have declared themselves to be the other gender. They say to refer to a child by their given name is “dead-naming.” That is why some teachers are pushing back against Senate Bill 12, passed earlier this year.

Senate Bill 12—the Parents’ Bill of Rights—prohibits public schools from assisting children who try to present themselves as the opposite sex. The legislation was necessary because too many teachers seem to believe it is their job to help students hide their gender confusion from their parents.

SB 12 is designed to prevent schools from enabling the delusion of students who say they are the opposite sex, including calling a boy Susan if his name is Bill.

According to the teachers who spoke to the Texas Tribune, gender-confused students across Texas will suffer from “dead-naming” if SB 12 is implemented.

Over the past decade, DEI infused curriculums have normalized the idea that kids can transition from one gender to the other, by teaching that the sex that is recorded on birth certificates is arbitrary. According to DEI, every individual chooses what sex they are—male, female or other—and there are lots in that third category.

My guess is that most teachers are happy that SB 12 put an end to this madness, but the ones who talked with the Texas Tribune are deeply concerned that they will no longer be able to teach kids that there are dozens of genders and they just need to pick one. These teachers say they pride themselves on openness—except when it applies to parents. They believe the Parents’ Bill of Rights is interfering with their ability to push this stuff on kids in classrooms across Texas, while keeping it from their parents. Hopefully, no one but the Texas Tribune will take them seriously.

Officials are continuing to study the clues Thomas Crooks left behind, particularly since it has become clear that President Joe Biden’s FBI blew the investigation. The feds stopped asking questions at a point in time in 2020, when Crooks was a strong Trump supporter, before he become such a violent Trump hater that he ultimately tried to shoot him.

We don’t know what went wrong, but investigators should examine what happened to him at school. Was he taught that he could simply declare himself they/them? What do his teachers say?

Finally, if you think this story is vaguely reminiscent of stories you have heard about other shooters over the last few years, that’s because it is.

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

You can also listen to the Sherry Sylvester Show on Apple or Spotify.

Categories
Winners & Losers

Winners & Losers: Foreign Terrorists, College Degrees, Texas FEMA & Jelly Roll

Every Friday morning, I join the Cardle & Woolley Show on Talk 1370 Radio in Austin to announce the week’s Winners & Losers. While the congressional map wars continue and would-be candidates wait for the smoke to clear, here’s who made the list:

WINNER: Gov. Greg Abbott Goes After Muslim Extremists in Texas

After recent events in Michigan—and England, Gov. Greg Abbott continues to ramp up his efforts to ensure that Sharia Law gains no foothold in the Lone Star State. This week, the governor declared the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Muslim Brotherhood foreign terrorist and transnational criminal organizations, prohibiting them from buying land. Yesterday, Abbott ordered the DPS to investigate both groups. The Muslim Brotherhood has spawned many organizations, including Hamas, and CAIR often serves as an apologist voice for Muslim violence, including following the Oct. 7, 2023 attack on Israel. CAIR insists it is a civil rights organization, and it is suing Abbott for going after them, but comments by its leadership (including referring to Zionist groups as “enemies”) disproves that characterization.

Here at TPPF, we noticed that CAIR recently testified against the new comprehensive social studies curriculum. It prefers the vague and unstructured standards that are currently in place that have allowed misinformation and ideology to be leaked into what K-12 students study. Texans can be thankful that Abbott is making it clear we’re having none of that in Texas.

WINNER: TrumpRX & Jelly Roll

A great winner leading up to Thanksgiving is the news this week that country music star Jelly Roll has lost 200 pounds. The formerly very fat guy—he once weighed over 500 pounds – is another good sign that health is in and the whole “body positivity” propaganda movement, which declared that obesity is just a lifestyle choice, is over.

Much of this is due to the GLP-1 medications including Ozempic and Wegovy, which were designed to treat diabetes, but turned out to be the most effective weight loss drug in history so far.

The only problem is that the drugs are very expensive and so far, lots of the people showing big weight loss are movie stars and celebrities who can afford a medication that can cost over a thousand dollars a month—and is not usually covered by insurance.

President Trump announced last week that he intends to change all that. He calls it TrumpRX, and it will lower the prices of the drugs so that regular fat people can more easily afford them. Ozempic, the most expensive, would drop from $1350 a month to $350 a month in his plan—still pricey, but manageable. Currently, the medication is administered through shots, but oral versions are being developed, and Trump hopes to provide the initial doses at $150 a month.

The U.S. has more obese people than any other country in the world—74% of the country is overweight. If President Trump can pull this off, it could be more transformational than anything he’s done so far. Granted, world peace and securing the border are enormously important, but this is so much closer to home. Three out of four people are overweight, and Trump has a plan that could change that.

If he can pull this off, depending on the time line, he probably doesn’t need to worry about the mid-terms, and certainly can make sure Republicans keep the White House and everything else in 2028. Can’t you see a giant red graph chart on the White House lawn showing trillions of pounds lost? Make America Thin Again!

Winner: A College Degree Still Matters

A new report by Axios this week suggests that maybe we don’t know as much as we think we know. Texas is leading the way in bringing back campuses that that support open inquiry and debate. But nobody likes what is going on in higher education today, and we often hear that a college degree doesn’t matter much anymore.

Currently, only 20% of Republicans say a college degree is “very important,” compared to 43% of Democrats. Another 40% of Republicans say college is “fairly important,” but most people have had it with the astronomical costs, the woke culture and degree programs that don’t seem to line up with job opportunities.

But newly released census data reported by Axios and others shows that college graduates who are now 25 or older earn more than twice as much as their counterparts who are only high school graduates. According to the data, the median income of someone with at least a bachelor’s degree is $132,700, while a high school grad median income is $58,410.

Earnings for college-led households rose 6% over the past two decades, compared with a 3% increase for high school graduates.

That’s something to ponder as Education Secretary Linda McMahon announced this week that she is ready to shut down the U.S. Dept. of Education. She says that if the recent government shutdown proved one thing, it was that the bureaucrats at the Department of Education aren’t needed. Six weeks out, and nobody missed them.

LOSER: The Latest Jasmine Crockett Update

For those who are keeping a list, which includes me, the really dumb thing that U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas did this week was announce that her team had pulled together a more complete list of people who had taken campaign contributions from the notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, including Mitt Romney, George Bush and the National Republican Campaign Committee. That’s not true, of course. It turns out Crockett and her crackerjack team did not consider that there might be more than one Jeffrey Epstein in America. In fact, National Review found over 300 in a quick search including almost a hundred in New York alone. Crockett’s team also neglected to check contribution dates, since several of her big expose’s charged Epstein, the sex offender, with donating to Republicans after he was dead. I often cringe when President Trump describes one of his enemies as being a “low-IQ individual,” but when he says it about Crockett, he clearly has a point.

WINNER: Walking Back EVs

California continues to deny a Politico report from a couple of weeks ago that they are pulling back on their plan to phase out gasoline powered cars by 2035. President Trump is trying to overturn the policy, but, while Newsom and his crew continue to talk smack about the White House effort, Axios is reporting that state regulators realize that their requirement that all cars be electric by 2035—which is now 9 years away—is not realistic or even practical.

California has been the spear carrier in banning gas-powered cars, and other blue states were looking for it to lead, but the fact is that electric cars aren’t affordable, particularly without the tax incentives to buy them, and there aren’t enough charging stations. Recall that Biden appropriated $7.5 billion to build hundreds of them across the country, but couldn’t manage to even construct one.

In more good news for our fossil fuel producing state, the VA announced this week that they are pulling the plug (get it?) on the $77 million Biden had allocated to put charging stations on military bases.

WINNER: Texas UIL Blocking Foreign Student Recruitment

While the whole country continues to look for ways to unravel what is happening to college football—and all college sports (see former college athlete and TPPF Board Member Cody Campbell’s analysis here), it turns out that the University Interscholastic League Legislative Council is taking steps to block foreign exchange students from participating in high school varsity sports in Texas.

One coach noted that rules regulating American kids from going from one school to another to play sports are very strict, but foreign students are now marketing themselves on social media, catching the eyes of coaches and being recruited to enter the country as exchange students to play.

Under the proposed rules change, foreign exchange students will still be allowed to play in sports—they just won’t be able to participate on varsity teams. The rule still has to be approved by Texas Education Commissioner Mike Morath.

WINNER: Texas Emergency People

Former President Joe Biden did many dumb things, but one of the dumbest was when he accused Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick of not calling him back about disaster aid following Hurricane Beryl in 2024. Trying to make some kind of weird political point, Biden accused Patrick, who was acting governor at the time, of being unreachable even though he was in the state’s Emergency Operations Center for days, working alongside Biden’s federal FEMA employees.

The roar back from the Lt. Governor resulted in an unprecedented editorial from the Houston Chronicle where they admitting they had been wrong to believe Biden, and saying that Patrick was right and Texas is way ahead of FEMA. In addition to Lt. Gov. Patrick, the Chronicle praised the longtime director of the Texas Department of Emergency Management, Nim Kidd.

So it is not surprising that the Trump administration is now considering moving FEMA to Texas, at least partly because Nim Kidd turned down the FEMA job right after Trump was re-elected because he didn’t want to leave the Lone Star State. Nobody does. We’ll see what happens.

Gig’em, Wreck ‘em, Hook ‘em

In what may have been the best game anywhere this year (or any year), the maroon tribe over at Texas A&M managed to pull off the largest comeback victory in Aggie history, after being down 27 points to South Carolina at halftime. The Aggies are now 10-0 for the season, No. 1 in the SEC and at No. 3 in the national rankings.

Things didn’t go so well for the Longhorns last week, when another piece of the dream died. Even though the betting lines all favored Georgia over Texas going into the game, fundamentalist orange bloods—and many who are orange blood adjacent—believed that if the stars were aligned, the Longhorns could come out on top. But, of course, the stars were out of whack and Texas dropped 7 points, to No. 17 in the national rankings

Up in Lubbock, the Red Raiders of Texas Tech are No. 1 in the Big 12 and they share No. 6 in the national rankings with my beloved Oregon Ducks. Tech easily demolished Central Florida on Saturday after their big College Game Day win against BYU the week before.

Texas A&M will take on the unranked bulldogs of Samford (not a typo) University in Alabama on Saturday at 11 a.m. in College Station while Texas plays Arkansas in Austin at 2:30 p.m. Texas Tech isn’t playing this weekend.

WINNERS & LOSERS will be off next week for Thanksgiving, but in case you missed it, I want to share my story of what happened in the Massachusetts Bay that first Thanksgiving—complete with the socialism and the number of Indians that were actually at the big dinner.

According to [William] Bradford, not long after the Pilgrims landed in 1620, they found that the collectivity they had instituted in the colony bred “confusion and discontent and retard[ed] much employment” because men did not want to work without pay for other men’s families. And so, a little more than a year after the first Thanksgiving, they decided to divide up the land they had so that everybody had a share and could grow what they wanted. Productivity increased, and the colony began to prosper, attracting more and more immigrants and ushering in the great migration from England.

Read the rest of the article here.

Sherry Sylvester is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and the former Senior Advisor to Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

Sign up to receive this in your inbox every week at www.texaspolicy.com/9thandCongress.

Follow me on X @sylvester1630 and follow my podcast, the Sherry Sylvester Show on AppleSpotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

Related content